Has to be a bait thread.... not going to bite
True or False: Julio Cesar Chavez was AVERAGE @ 140 and above
Collapse
-
-
He is the same guy that said this
Cotto's flat footed, come forward style would cost him a career ending beatdown at the hands of Canelo Alvarez. Unless Cotto trys to move and box like he did in Margarito 2, Cotto is going to get combination-ed to death and it will be very bloody, with his son crying on the audience.Comment
-
you should be banned from every boxing forum...JCC was a basic fighter, but at lower weights he had a chin made of steel and good bodywork, when he moved up in weight and started fighting guys who weren't the size of 5th graders, who had power, things didn't turn out good for him.
Looking at JCC'S skillset,(flat footed and no defense) and history was he average @ 140 or better? because he sure as hell wasn't good.Comment
-
-
Even though Chavez was undersized at WW and lost (or should have lost) in his big fights there, look at whom he was fighting. Pernell Whitaker and a 25 year old Oscar DLH.
He could probably have won a title at WW against lesser opposition than those fighters.
At 140, Chavez was still a hell of a fighter, mostly in the late 80s and early 90s. He peaked at 135 against Rosario.Comment
-
-
JCC was a basic fighter, but at lower weights he had a chin made of steel and good bodywork, when he moved up in weight and started fighting guys who weren't the size of 5th graders, who had power, things didn't turn out good for him.
Looking at JCC'S skillset,(flat footed and no defense) and history was he average @ 140 or better? because he sure as hell wasn't good.
Last edited by BOXEO _; 07-11-2015, 02:08 PM.Comment
-
Bro did you really just go from saying he is a basic fighter and "sure as hell not good" to saying he is better than Mayweather?
Let's just make this clear now, YDKSAB.
To others, should we call this easiest poll of 2015 or nah? Even easier than the one on Garcia and Tito
Comment
Comment