Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lara,Golovkin,Ward,Kovalev

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lara,Golovkin,Ward,Kovalev

    I'm starting to see a pattern here,and its kinda funny,so just follow along.
    Lara.154
    Ggg.160
    Ward.168
    Kovalev.175
    If Lara fights ggg and loses,people will say that Lara was too small,and ggg was too big. If ggg fights ward,and loses,people will say that ggg was too small,and ward was to big. If ward loses against kovalev,people will say that ward was too small,and kovalev was too big.
    Do you guys think that any of these fights can end with the originally bigger fighter winning,and the outcome not be attributed to the fighters size?

  • #2
    Well boo ***in hoo

    Comment


    • #3
      Great thread 5/5

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by aldo5408 View Post
        Great thread 5/5
        Thanks,I try my best.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by mike1010011 View Post
          Thanks,I try my best.
          But seriously all these guys are at the top of their divisions. and should stay there and try to unify and then move up

          Comment


          • #6
            Lol. Junior divisions didn't even exist at one point in boxing's history. Now guys that weigh 154 and rehydrate to 172 are too small to be MWs. Etc, etc.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mike1010011 View Post
              I'm starting to see a pattern here,and its kinda funny,so just follow along.
              Lara.154
              Ggg.160
              Ward.168
              Kovalev.175
              If Lara fights ggg and loses,people will say that Lara was too small,and ggg was too big. If ggg fights ward,and loses,people will say that ggg was too small,and ward was to big. If ward loses against kovalev,people will say that ward was too small,and kovalev was too big.
              Do you guys think that any of these fights can end with the originally bigger fighter winning,and the outcome not be attributed to the fighters size?
              The only issue, Ward is the same height as Kovalev. The reach is nearly the same too

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by aldo5408 View Post
                But seriously all these guys are at the top of their divisions. and should stay there and try to unify and then move up
                That would be the ideal situation,but things reach a point in boxing,that if you're too dominant in your division,people start crying for you to move up and push yourself,despite not having unified the division. GGG doesnt have all the middleweight belts,yet people want him to move up to face ward. Ward doesnt have all the supermiddleweight belts,yet they want him to move up and face kovalev.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ThatLeftaMarc View Post
                  The only issue, Ward is the same height as Kovalev. The reach is nearly the same too
                  Yes they'd be in the same height and reach division.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mike1010011 View Post
                    I'm starting to see a pattern here,and its kinda funny,so just follow along.
                    Lara.154
                    Ggg.160
                    Ward.168
                    Kovalev.175
                    If Lara fights ggg and loses,people will say that Lara was too small,and ggg was too big. If ggg fights ward,and loses,people will say that ggg was too small,and ward was to big. If ward loses against kovalev,people will say that ward was too small,and kovalev was too big.
                    Do you guys think that any of these fights can end with the originally bigger fighter winning,and the outcome not be attributed to the fighters size?
                    Lara doesn't belong on that list. He isn't unbeaten and No1 in his own division like the other 3.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP