Comments Thread For: Pavlik Says Cotto Too Small, Golovkin-Canelo is The Fight

[W1LLPARK3R]

Not to flog a dead horse but...Floyd is well known to be 5'8" as listed... Here is a pic from their weigh in: [IMG[IMG]http://***65532;[/IMG]

[W1LLPARK3R]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/09/14/article-2420469-1BCEFD1E000005DC-137_634x403.jpg

[alexKO]

Sergio said Cotto was too small too, how did that work out?

What makes Pavlik a moron though is the same thing that makes the people on here agree with him. How in the **** does beating Canelo better for GGG than beating a Cotto? A 4 division champ, future HoF with a much better resume and people are saying he'd get more credit for beating Canelo? Comments like that make it easy to see the people who don't know jack **** about boxing. Canelo is a tougher fight because... he weighs more?

Yes, because it's not like GGG has fought guys bigger than Canelo already or anything... Morons, seriously.

Cotto has spent the majority of his career at 140-147. Canelo has been at 154 since he was 19 in 2010 and is still growing, hence the 155 catchweights.

Beating a 24-year-old legitimate 154 champion who now fights as a middleweight is more credible than fighting a guy whose best days were at 147 and is in his mid 30's.

After all, Cotto has been bludgeoned several times before so the 'shopworn' card will be played when GGG brutally levels him.

[Beater_of_ass]

Cotto has spent the majority of his career at 140-147. Canelo has been at 154 since he was 19 in 2010 and is still growing, hence the 155 catchweights.

Beating a 24-year-old legitimate 154 champion who now fights as a middleweight is more credible than fighting a guy whose best days were at 147 and is in his mid 30's.

After all, Cotto has been bludgeoned several times before so the 'shopworn' card will be played when GGG brutally levels him.

Canelo's spent the majority of his career at 147 also, what the ****?

How can Canelo be the legitimate 154 champion when the only belt he won at 154 was the "b*tch" version of the WBC belt? Floyd had the real WBC belt and Trout had the "normal" one which he won with open scoring in Texas. That's not legitimate in anyway lmfao. Cotto was the man at 140, the man at 147, the man at 154 and the man 160. Canelo has only been the man at 155.

GGG beating Canelo is like beating himself. A guy with 1 or 2 good wins and a whole bunch of hype. The difference is GGG hasn't struggled with anyone and Canelo struggles against any who even remotely boxes. But, feel free to fall into the hype train again it'll make that much better when it derails again.

[Joe Beamish]

Well u are in for a surprise at the cotto face off..Cotto is maybe 5'7" tops..Alvarez will barely be taller..

They look about the same size in the photo in this youboob link. Please feel free to provide photos that prove how tiny canelo is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc3cV1E8Y-0

[Larry the boss]

Canelo is always listed at 5'9. One inch shorter than GGG. Man up.

He clearly is not 5'9 man

[Larry the boss]

But is Golovkin really 5'10?

[Larry the boss]

these pictures are odd man,how tall are these fighters?

[Joe Beamish]

He clearly is not 5'9 man

I dunno. I think he looks EXACTLY 5'9". Floyd is 5'8".

[W1LLPARK3R]

these pictures are odd man,how tall are these fighters?

Maybe Canelo had platforms or something...lol