Comments Thread For: Crawford: If The Pacquiao Fight Happens, It Happens
Collapse
-
This is why Dunn is on my ignore list. Posts like that. Smh. I mean, it's one thing to have an opinion but it's another to be a flat out fanboy, which is what he and a lot of others are. Manny just handled Floyd. What makes anyone with a boxing bran think Crawford's yellow ass is going to beat Manny? Based on what? Same with Khan. Same with Maidana's fat ass. Same with Thurman's arrogant ass. Bring them all on. Unless Manny ages in a fight, no one is beating him right now.
If these fights happen and I am proven wrong, I will log on, admit I was wrong, and wear it. You think you would ever be capable of doing that?Comment
-
Maybe Crawford vs the winner of Lundy vs Herrerathat wouldn't be bad for him at all. Arum really don't have much for him at 140 because most of the other 140 guys are with PBC, Matthysse is with GBP and he seems to want a big name like Pacquiao. If Arum won't do Matthysse vs Pacquiao then Oscar likely won't do Crawford vs Matthysse either
As for him vs Pacquiao, maybe late next year but he should be allowed a few more fights at 140 before moving up to 147Comment
-
-
This is why Dunn is on my ignore list. Posts like that. Smh. I mean, it's one thing to have an opinion but it's another to be a flat out fanboy, which is what he and a lot of others are. Manny just handled Floyd. What makes anyone with a boxing bran think Crawford's yellow ass is going to beat Manny? Based on what? Same with Khan. Same with Maidana's fat ass. Same with Thurman's arrogant ass. Bring them all on. Unless Manny ages in a fight, no one is beating him right now.Comment
-
You are the king of ****** comments and a complexed guy who either tries to act intelligent, pretending to be "a student of the game", or tries to ACT HARD ON THE INTERNET with a pic of prison in his sign saying "never coming back" or whatever... feeling a strange need to let us know that those few months you were absent from boxingscene was because you were incarcerated...
Now let's get to business: At this point it is very possible that Crawford beats him and everyone who's objective knows that Pacquiao is way past his prime. It's 55/45 fight in Manny's favor. He's my favorite fighter of the last decade and Crawford is one of my favorite new guys. If anything, a win over Manny would just solidify him as the next big thing. I'd be sad for Manny but I'd be proud of Crawford.
Next: I always loved Marquez and still love him but it's evident he's on PEDs, and by the way I don't care too much about the roids, not a big deal, as 50% of boxers use them anyways just like some of my favorite fighters like Morales and Holyfield used to, and who knows how many others... aaand I stil applaud Marquez on that counter punch... See? I stopped worrying about PEDs, I just accepted the fact that Marquez is using them, but it's you Floyd's groupies who is making a big deal out of it because while you know as well as I know that JMM cheated, you chose to be ignorant and to pretend he was clean, but as I said - many fighters are using them anyways, it may not be cool but whatever, let's just not cry about it, JMM won 1 of the 4 fights and the fight was unforgetable. Cong**** to him.
Morales loss: Morales is one of my favorite boxers, am I hating him or discrediting him in any way? He gets the full credit for that win.
[In Chris Algieri's voice] "Floyd is best at being Floyd." He fought Pac way past his prime, his goal was just to add his name to his resume, not to beat the best version of Pacquiao, if it was than he would fight him 5 years earlier. You Larry are just like Floyd - whining about people never giving Floyd the full credit, but Floyd himself never tried to get the full credit because he only wanted to add other boxers names to his resume when they were a shell of their old selves. Nobody is saying he'd lose those fights but he chose not to show us what would then happen. Now a bit about the actual fight: It was close but it looked to me like Floyd won. Would I call it a robery? Hell no. Was Floyd impressive? Hell no, he did kind of enough to win it... in fact it's not him who did enough, it was Manny who was at his worst ever. Cong**** to Floyd, he won against Manny, but against 37 years old Manny, not 31 years old Manny who we wanted to see him trying to beat, but you groupies are still trying to make it look like he beat Pac at his prime.
I'm an idiot for even trying to explain something to you keybord warriors and "boxing experts", t his is my last post here, there's no normal conversation here so I'll let you anti-pac and anti-floyd fools lead your forum wars freely...Comment
-
Maybe Crawford vs the winner of Lundy vs Herrerathat wouldn't be bad for him at all. Arum really don't have much for him at 140 because most of the other 140 guys are with PBC, Matthysse is with GBP and he seems to want a big name like Pacquiao. If Arum won't do Matthysse vs Pacquiao then Oscar likely won't do Crawford vs Matthysse either
As for him vs Pacquiao, maybe late next year but he should be allowed a few more fights at 140 before moving up to 147
Matthysse, Provodnikov, Vargas, Postol, Herrera, Benavidez, Soto that's most of the major players in the division. Cuenca-Yang winner, IBF champ.
Only Peterson and Broner from PBC.Comment
-
Comment
-
Feel free to laugh, sadly that "Looooooooooooool" you just wrote is what an average post on NBS look like. This is a boxing FORUM (get it?) and guess what? Forums are supposed to give people opportunity to write meaningfull posts and read them, but all you are doing is trolling but I can't judge you, you simply aren't intelligent enough to write something meaningfull... and keep in mind that english is my 3rd language, I've never been in an english speaking country and I have no english speaking friends, however I put an effort to write something of a substance, I only forgot your IQ is too low to read anything longer than an "Looooooooooooool".
Calling me a butthurt Pac fan proves you guys haven't read it, if you had you would have known that in that very same post I wrote, I was saying how Pac wasn't robbed against Floyd and that I take nothing from guys who beat him (beside Bradley), wich is totally opposite of what Larry wrote earlier. I just explained him how I see Manny's losses.
PS: Thank you Bob! That's exactly what I'm trying to explain here.Last edited by StefanTosic; 07-07-2015, 05:49 PM.Comment
-
Comment