Tweet
You are the king of ****** comments and a complexed guy who either tries to act intelligent, pretending to be "a student of the game", or tries to ACT HARD ON THE INTERNET with a pic of prison in his sign saying "never coming back" or whatever... feeling a strange need to let us know that those few months you were absent from boxingscene was because you were incarcerated...
Now let's get to business: At this point it is very possible that Crawford beats him and everyone who's objective knows that Pacquiao is way past his prime. It's 55/45 fight in Manny's favor. He's my favorite fighter of the last decade and Crawford is one of my favorite new guys. If anything, a win over Manny would just solidify him as the next big thing. I'd be sad for Manny but I'd be proud of Crawford.
Next: I always loved Marquez and still love him but it's evident he's on PEDs, and by the way I don't care too much about the roids, not a big deal, as 50% of boxers use them anyways just like some of my favorite fighters like Morales and Holyfield used to, and who knows how many others... aaand I stil applaud Marquez on that counter punch... See? I stopped worrying about PEDs, I just accepted the fact that Marquez is using them, but it's you Floyd's groupies who is making a big deal out of it because while you know as well as I know that JMM cheated, you chose to be ignorant and to pretend he was clean, but as I said - many fighters are using them anyways, it may not be cool but whatever, let's just not cry about it, JMM won 1 of the 4 fights and the fight was unforgetable. Cong**** to him.
Morales loss: Morales is one of my favorite boxers, am I hating him or discrediting him in any way? He gets the full credit for that win.
[In Chris Algieri's voice] "Floyd is best at being Floyd." He fought Pac way past his prime, his goal was just to add his name to his resume, not to beat the best version of Pacquiao, if it was than he would fight him 5 years earlier. You Larry are just like Floyd - whining about people never giving Floyd the full credit, but Floyd himself never tried to get the full credit because he only wanted to add other boxers names to his resume when they were a shell of their old selves. Nobody is saying he'd lose those fights but he chose not to show us what would then happen. Now a bit about the actual fight: It was close but it looked to me like Floyd won. Would I call it a robery? Hell no. Was Floyd impressive? Hell no, he did kind of enough to win it... in fact it's not him who did enough, it was Manny who was at his worst ever. Cong**** to Floyd, he won against Manny, but against 37 years old Manny, not 31 years old Manny who we wanted to see him trying to beat, but you groupies are still trying to make it look like he beat Pac at his prime.
I'm an idiot for even trying to explain something to you keybord warriors and "boxing experts", t his is my last post here, there's no normal conversation here so I'll let you anti-pac and anti-floyd fools lead your forum wars freely...
Now let's get to business: At this point it is very possible that Crawford beats him and everyone who's objective knows that Pacquiao is way past his prime. It's 55/45 fight in Manny's favor. He's my favorite fighter of the last decade and Crawford is one of my favorite new guys. If anything, a win over Manny would just solidify him as the next big thing. I'd be sad for Manny but I'd be proud of Crawford.
Next: I always loved Marquez and still love him but it's evident he's on PEDs, and by the way I don't care too much about the roids, not a big deal, as 50% of boxers use them anyways just like some of my favorite fighters like Morales and Holyfield used to, and who knows how many others... aaand I stil applaud Marquez on that counter punch... See? I stopped worrying about PEDs, I just accepted the fact that Marquez is using them, but it's you Floyd's groupies who is making a big deal out of it because while you know as well as I know that JMM cheated, you chose to be ignorant and to pretend he was clean, but as I said - many fighters are using them anyways, it may not be cool but whatever, let's just not cry about it, JMM won 1 of the 4 fights and the fight was unforgetable. Cong**** to him.
Morales loss: Morales is one of my favorite boxers, am I hating him or discrediting him in any way? He gets the full credit for that win.
[In Chris Algieri's voice] "Floyd is best at being Floyd." He fought Pac way past his prime, his goal was just to add his name to his resume, not to beat the best version of Pacquiao, if it was than he would fight him 5 years earlier. You Larry are just like Floyd - whining about people never giving Floyd the full credit, but Floyd himself never tried to get the full credit because he only wanted to add other boxers names to his resume when they were a shell of their old selves. Nobody is saying he'd lose those fights but he chose not to show us what would then happen. Now a bit about the actual fight: It was close but it looked to me like Floyd won. Would I call it a robery? Hell no. Was Floyd impressive? Hell no, he did kind of enough to win it... in fact it's not him who did enough, it was Manny who was at his worst ever. Cong**** to Floyd, he won against Manny, but against 37 years old Manny, not 31 years old Manny who we wanted to see him trying to beat, but you groupies are still trying to make it look like he beat Pac at his prime.
I'm an idiot for even trying to explain something to you keybord warriors and "boxing experts", t his is my last post here, there's no normal conversation here so I'll let you anti-pac and anti-floyd fools lead your forum wars freely...
spot on tosic!
Comment