Comments Thread For: Crawford: If The Pacquiao Fight Happens, It Happens

[Reece33]

Reece33

Man look u Floyd haters. Crawford or Bradley would lose to mayweather easily people n people Floyd beat pacquaio easily n just because he moves a lot doesn't mean he runs

[DeadLikeMe]

You are the king of ****** comments and a complexed guy who either tries to act intelligent, pretending to be "a student of the game", or tries to ACT HARD ON THE INTERNET with a pic of prison in his sign saying "never coming back" or whatever... feeling a strange need to let us know that those few months you were absent from boxingscene was because you were incarcerated...

Now let's get to business: At this point it is very possible that Crawford beats him and everyone who's objective knows that Pacquiao is way past his prime. It's 55/45 fight in Manny's favor. He's my favorite fighter of the last decade and Crawford is one of my favorite new guys. If anything, a win over Manny would just solidify him as the next big thing. I'd be sad for Manny but I'd be proud of Crawford.

Next: I always loved Marquez and still love him but it's evident he's on PEDs, and by the way I don't care too much about the roids, not a big deal, as 50% of boxers use them anyways just like some of my favorite fighters like Morales and Holyfield used to, and who knows how many others... aaand I stil applaud Marquez on that counter punch... See? I stopped worrying about PEDs, I just accepted the fact that Marquez is using them, but it's you Floyd's groupies who is making a big deal out of it because while you know as well as I know that JMM cheated, you chose to be ignorant and to pretend he was clean, but as I said - many fighters are using them anyways, it may not be cool but whatever, let's just not cry about it, JMM won 1 of the 4 fights and the fight was unforgetable. Cong**** to him.

Morales loss: Morales is one of my favorite boxers, am I hating him or discrediting him in any way? He gets the full credit for that win.

[In Chris Algieri's voice] "Floyd is best at being Floyd." He fought Pac way past his prime, his goal was just to add his name to his resume, not to beat the best version of Pacquiao, if it was than he would fight him 5 years earlier. You Larry are just like Floyd - whining about people never giving Floyd the full credit, but Floyd himself never tried to get the full credit because he only wanted to add other boxers names to his resume when they were a shell of their old selves. Nobody is saying he'd lose those fights but he chose not to show us what would then happen. Now a bit about the actual fight: It was close but it looked to me like Floyd won. Would I call it a robery? Hell no. Was Floyd impressive? Hell no, he did kind of enough to win it... in fact it's not him who did enough, it was Manny who was at his worst ever. Cong**** to Floyd, he won against Manny, but against 37 years old Manny, not 31 years old Manny who we wanted to see him trying to beat, but you groupies are still trying to make it look like he beat Pac at his prime.

I'm an idiot for even trying to explain something to you keybord warriors and "boxing experts", t his is my last post here, there's no normal conversation here so I'll let you anti-pac and anti-floyd fools lead your forum wars freely...

[-PBP-]

Crawford hasn't even established himself at 140 yet. At least let him win a title/unify/make a defense before he fights a top 3 welterweight. And SMH @ "not fighting Bradley ever" comment. With Top Rank's thin stable that limits the options for both of them.

[rocktx]

Won't fight Bradley because he's like his brother?

Now I dont have a brother, but if they offered me a few million to fight my brother, I'm whippin that azz

[Weebler I]

Crawford has a 3 inch reach advantage over Manny. If he can jab effectively and fight from the outside he can win this fight.

Crawford will have to be mentally strong enough to ignore the background noise from HBO and fans that will tell him to fight in a way that gives Manny the best chance to win.

Jab, move, neutralize the right hand-give yourself the best chance to win.

Crawford isn't beating Pacquiao, and Postol isn't beating Matthysse. Enough of this wishful thinking Dunn

Pacquiao will be motivated to show that a fully fit version of himself is nothing to mess with.

[MrClutch85]

Crawford need to take of business at 140. The Pacquiao that fought Mayweather would beat Crawford

[sicko]

Maybe Crawford vs the winner of Lundy vs Herrera that wouldn't be bad for him at all. Arum really don't have much for him at 140 because most of the other 140 guys are with PBC, Matthysse is with GBP and he seems to want a big name like Pacquiao. If Arum won't do Matthysse vs Pacquiao then Oscar likely won't do Crawford vs Matthysse either

As for him vs Pacquiao, maybe late next year but he should be allowed a few more fights at 140 before moving up to 147

[GOD-FR33]

Dunn the Fanboy.

Crawford isn't beating Pacquiao, and Postol isn't beating Matthysse. Enough of this wishful thinking Dunn

Pacquiao will be motivated to show that a fully fit version of himself is nothing to mess with.

This is why Dunn is on my ignore list. Posts like that. Smh. I mean, it's one thing to have an opinion but it's another to be a flat out fanboy, which is what he and a lot of others are. Manny just handled Floyd. What makes anyone with a boxing bran think Crawford's yellow ass is going to beat Manny? Based on what? Same with Khan. Same with Maidana's fat ass. Same with Thurman's arrogant ass. Bring them all on. Unless Manny ages in a fight, no one is beating him right now.

[DeadLikeMe]

This is why Dunn is on my ignore list. Posts like that. Smh. I mean, it's one thing to have an opinion but it's another to be a flat out fanboy, which is what he and a lot of others are. Manny just handled Floyd. What makes anyone with a boxing bran think Crawford's yellow ass is going to beat Manny? Based on what? Same with Khan. Same with Maidana's fat ass. Same with Thurman's arrogant ass. Bring them all on. Unless Manny ages in a fight, no one is beating him right now.

[The Big Dunn]

Crawford isn't beating Pacquiao, and Postol isn't beating Matthysse. Enough of this wishful thinking Dunn

Pacquiao will be motivated to show that a fully fit version of himself is nothing to mess with.

Just like Danny wasn't beating Matthysse and Floyd wasn't beating Manny.

It's not wishful thinking. I have never thought of Manny or Matthysse as highly as you and some others on NSB.

I also do not go around making PAC BOY and GOD FR33 level predictions of either losing to fighters they shouldn't. I said Crawford COULD win if he does certain things.

You can disagree with me, I'm fine with that.