Is there one Gennedy Golovkin opponent...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #41
    Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth
    GGG has been facing guys in the top 15 maybe up to top 25 but definitely in the top 50... His last 5 opponents were probably top 25 in boxrec.

    Murray, Geale, and Macklin were all probably top 10 guys at the time too.

    The thing is GGG is levels above these guys, hell I bet Nobuhiro Ishida was top 50 and Ishida KO'd Kirkland faster than Canelo did.
    He's talking P4P, Murray, Geale, Macklin were nowhere near top 10-15 even on boxrec.

    Comment

    • Barcham
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2015
      • 4263
      • 158
      • 65
      • 11,189

      #42
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
      He's talking P4P, Murray, Geale, Macklin were nowhere near top 10-15 even on boxrec.
      P4P lists are completely irrelevant in determining the quality of a fighter. They are totally subjective lists and no two of them are the same as they are too dependant on the opinion of the person putting the list together. People tend to find a site that has a list that fits with their own preferences and will defend that list to the death while dismissing all other lists that do not feature their favorite fighter in as high a position or that fighter is not on the list at all.

      Basically, P4P lists are totally useless.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #43
        Originally posted by Barcham
        P4P lists are completely irrelevant in determining the quality of a fighter. They are totally subjective lists and no two of them are the same as they are too dependant on the opinion of the person putting the list together. People tend to find a site that has a list that fits with their own preferences and will defend that list to the death while dismissing all other lists that do not feature their favorite fighter in as high a position or that fighter is not on the list at all.

        Basically, P4P lists are totally useless.
        Boxrec uses a points system, opinion doesn't come into it.

        Comment

        • Barcham
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2015
          • 4263
          • 158
          • 65
          • 11,189

          #44
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
          Boxrec uses a points system, opinion doesn't come into it.
          Points systems do not work with P4P lists. There are simply too many variables to take into consideration and certain areas are given more weight than others because that is what the person creating the system personally feels is important. Some people, for instance, believe that heavyweights do not belong on any P4P list and others believe that a person cannot be properly considered if he has only fought at one weight class.

          They can be fun as a discussion topic but people tend to take them WAY TOO SERIOUSLY.

          Comment

          • SilverMiles
            It Was A Draw Doe!!!!
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2014
            • 4448
            • 489
            • 103
            • 35,552

            #45
            Pound for pound list rely too much on popularity and a lot of time writers use them as a way to hype fighters.

            Ring ranked Broner for some off reason and Crawford is ranked now based on a win over lightly regarded Beltran and a featherweight.

            Most time they don't truly represent the sport and most time refuse to move a fighter from #1 even when there clearly not the best fighter in the world.

            Comment

            • Queen_Leia
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2004
              • 4256
              • 312
              • 487
              • 30,245

              #46
              Originally posted by SilverMiles
              Pound for pound list rely too much on popularity and a lot of time writers use them as a way to hype fighters.

              Ring ranked Broner for some off reason and Crawford is ranked now based on a win over lightly regarded Beltran and a featherweight.

              Most time they don't truly represent the sport and most time refuse to move a fighter from #1 even when there clearly not the best fighter in the world.

              P4P are opinionated based but is a needed apparatus. if you are one of the best in boxing, there needs to be a list to distinguish the elite from the cab drivers.

              If we had no check and balances, we would see fighters like rod Salka fighting a fighter like Terrence Crawford and we would be calling it a elite fights.

              No, thanks to P4P list, we know that Salka is a garbage fighter because he will never be on that list. Yes P4P are opinionated based but universally if a fighter belong on the list but more so the order.

              We all agree whether you hate him or not that Floyd Mayweather belong on a P4p list just like we all agree whether you hate him or not that Rod Salka doesn't belong on any P4P list.


              Is Gennedy fought any P4P fighters yet?

              Comment

              • Queen_Leia
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Sep 2004
                • 4256
                • 312
                • 487
                • 30,245

                #47
                Originally posted by Cinci Champ
                im not saying hes scared but it is strange hes not willing to fight the ones who are willing like ward and lara
                Gennedy may not want any pound for pound fighters on his boxing resume.

                Comment

                • Queen_Leia
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2004
                  • 4256
                  • 312
                  • 487
                  • 30,245

                  #48
                  I just look at his resume last night again...none of the fighters on tha tlist could make a top 50 pound for pound list.

                  Comment

                  • 2shameless
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 1728
                    • 464
                    • 600
                    • 8,843

                    #49
                    But GGG is a coward for wanting to fight #1 p4p and current linear, WBA and WBC 154 lb champ at 154.

                    You can't make this stuff up.

                    Comment

                    • mike1010011
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2014
                      • 2934
                      • 834
                      • 847
                      • 56,165

                      #50
                      Originally posted by 2shameless
                      But GGG is a coward for wanting to fight #1 p4p and current linear, WBA and WBC 154 lb champ at 154.

                      You can't make this stuff up.
                      Too small doe,too old doe,not a real 154 lb fighter doe,deserves to fight berto doe.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP