Comments Thread For: Brook Has October Backup if Brandon Rios Falls Out

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Chris Van Heerden isn't.

I'm discussing the subject at hand, which is: Brook's fight with Rios. You inserting Khan is a deflection, ad hominem fallacy.

You mentioned Khan first

We all know what your agenda is anyway. It's pathetic.

I forgot to add "be constantly butthurt about Carl Froch's success" to your posting patterns.

[kiaba360]

Rios is probably looking for Bradley (a winnable fight). IDK who Brook's back-up would be though, probably won't be better than Rios.

[Box-Office]

You mentioned Khan first

We all know what your agenda is anyway. It's pathetic.

I forgot to add "be constantly butthurt about Carl Froch's success" to your posting patterns.

Butt hurt about what? Getting dominated by a cripple?

It's part of the Kell Brook formula to mention Khan's name to hype **** fights. Your strategy is to always go back to "Khan ducking Brook lalalallala". That's what I mea......mehh I'm already bored.

[brettWall]

Give him another cab driver, a ref that doesn't do anything about clinching and promote the fight with Khan's name in it. It's a winning formula for this one dimensional hype job.

[SchoolTheseCats]

Source?

Rematch clauses are standard for voluntary defences anyway.

Late responding don't know if anyone answered fat Dan said it on his chat yesterday they snagged up on rematch clause that shouldn't stop fight normal for championship contests