Originally posted by FLYBOY
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Kell Brook the luckiest boxer atm?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostActually this is what Khan said after Brook defeated Porter...
6.38 onwards
"Well, let's have it man......I mean if he wants to fight, I'm ready....Kell thought I was going to say no to it. Look I'll take that fight, I'll take it with both hands....I don't think Kell will want to fight me....I want to give the British fans what they want. Come on, lets get it on man!"
8.45
"Now he's earned his shot. He's put a great fight on. He's won a good fight against Porter so why not? We can get that fight done now. I mean he's proven himself. He's answered ALL the questions"
"Amir Khan rattled the cage of British rival Kell Brook having opted to headline in Las Vegas against American Devon Alexander in December calling it "a bigger, more difficult fight" in spite of Sheffield***8217;s Brook holding the IBF welterweight crown.
"At this point it probably is a tougher fight than Kell Brook," said Khan of his rival, who returned to training this week after being viciously stabbed in the leg on holiday in Tenerife.
While Khan dutifully maintained he was not looking beyond his December 13 opponent, his promoter Oscar De La Hoya fully expects victory in Las Vegas to bring the British welterweight a fight with Floyd Mayweather Jnr in May 2015.
The problem with Khan's theory over Brook is that Brook beat the man, who beat the man. Brook beat Shawn Porter, who had beaten Khan***8217;s next opponent, Alexander, to claim the IBF belt. It put Brook on a pedestal with two other welterweight kings - Mayweather, and Manny Pacquiao. Calling it bragging rights, but right now, Brook, recovering or not, holds some booty around his waist.
Khan disagrees, though. "Even though he's a world champion, styles make fights. This is definitely a tougher fight. There will be more action in this fight. No disrespect to Kell, I could have taken the easier fight and fought Kell in the UK but that's not the type of fighter I am."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ger-fight.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostNope I was a fan of both and wanted to see the fight.
People who make all the excuses in the world for why this fight can't happen are not "objective".
No one has still come up with a reason as to why Kell isn't the least bit lucky, dude is still riding off the 1 live body he beat in his whole career.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View PostHe's had 2 fights since winning the title 10 months ago and 1 was his mandatory. He tried to fight Khan and wants to fight Mayweather. That's not holding it hostage.
So yeah, not really holding it hostage at all, really. He's hardly the new Sven Ottke.
If he's only fought '1 live opponent' in his career, that's still one more than Thurman has fought. That's one more than GGG has fought and look at his reputation! That dude wants to fight a 147lb-er for his first real test.
Sorry but the OP post just reeks of jealousy and butt hurt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arraamis View PostThat fraud made those statements while on the set post-fight, then he ran off to fight Devon Alexander, making the following statements:
"Amir Khan rattled the cage of British rival Kell Brook having opted to headline in Las Vegas against American Devon Alexander in December calling it "a bigger, more difficult fight" in spite of Sheffield’s Brook holding the IBF welterweight crown.
"At this point it probably is a tougher fight than Kell Brook," said Khan of his rival, who returned to training this week after being viciously stabbed in the leg on holiday in Tenerife.
While Khan dutifully maintained he was not looking beyond his December 13 opponent, his promoter Oscar De La Hoya fully expects victory in Las Vegas to bring the British welterweight a fight with Floyd Mayweather Jnr in May 2015.
The problem with Khan's theory over Brook is that Brook beat the man, who beat the man. Brook beat Shawn Porter, who had beaten Khan’s next opponent, Alexander, to claim the IBF belt. It put Brook on a pedestal with two other welterweight kings - Mayweather, and Manny Pacquiao. Calling it bragging rights, but right now, Brook, recovering or not, holds some booty around his waist.
Khan disagrees, though. "Even though he's a world champion, styles make fights. This is definitely a tougher fight. There will be more action in this fight. No disrespect to Kell, I could have taken the easier fight and fought Kell in the UK but that's not the type of fighter I am."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oth...ger-fight.html
What an absolute wanker.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cameltoe View PostAnd got stabbed and nearly bled to death within that 10 month period.
So yeah, not really holding it hostage at all, really. He's hardly the new Sven Ottke.
If he's only fought '1 live opponent' in his career, that's still one more than Thurman has fought. That's one more than GGG has fought and look at his reputation! That dude wants to fight a 147lb-er for his first real test.
Sorry but the OP post just reeks of jealousy and butt hurt.
Still waiting for someone to post decent counter points to my OP.
Comment
-
Comment