Do you consider a boxer to be in his prime after 110 fights??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wmute
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 8084
    • 289
    • 446
    • 15,158

    #41
    Originally posted by Gunstar1
    You proved that you're an ****** with that old thread, keep spamming.
    which would be the thread in which I proved I am AN ******?

    Comment

    • IwatchBoxing
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2004
      • 10527
      • 235
      • 403
      • 11,555

      #42
      Primes depend on the guy, how old he is, and how long he boxed. There is a particluar group of fighters I noticed lose theirs primes after 10 years

      Just to say hey, after 110 fights your unprimed, doesn't make sense...
      Last edited by IwatchBoxing; 04-03-2006, 11:42 AM.

      Comment

      • GunStar
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10656
        • 774
        • 2,464
        • 12,344

        #43
        Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
        Primes depend on the guy, how old he is, and how long he boxed. There is a particluar group of fighters I noticed lose theirs primes after 10 years

        Just to say hey, after 110 fights your unprimed, doesn't make sense...
        The point of this thread was, a boxer can't be at his best after 110 fights, yea some boxers were still good like Robinson. But it is not possible for any boxer to be in prime after that many fights, a few can still be good. Also let's not forget that Robinson second career the man lost 17 fights, that came shortly after his 110 fights.

        **** 110 professional fights takes alot out of your body. Just go ask any boxer.

        Comment

        • wmute
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2003
          • 8084
          • 289
          • 446
          • 15,158

          #44
          Originally posted by Gunstar1
          The point of this thread was, a boxer can't be at his best after 110 fights, yea some boxers were still good like Robinson. But it is not possible for any boxer to be in prime after that many fights, a few can still be good.
          interesting opinions... presented as usual with little or no backup, nor empirical, nor logical.

          Originally posted by Gunstar1
          Also let's not forget that Robinson second career the man lost 17 fights, that came shortly after his 110 fights.
          FYI Robinson second career started in 1955 at the age of almost 33, after a 30+ months layoff, and the 1st fight of robinson 2nd career was his 137th fight.

          the fight, which was discussed in the other thread took place in 1950, when he was 29 and it was his 113 fight. Do the math


          Originally posted by Gunstar1
          **** 110 professional fights takes alot out of your body. Just go ask any boxer.
          sure how many fighters are alive of those that had 100+ fights before their 30s?

          which reminds me (from
          http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...6&page=7&pp=10)

          Originally posted by Yogi
          ****, when talking about his 114th professional fight (TKO-4 Enrique Bolanos in 1949), Ike Williams called that "the best fight of his career" and "that's the fight that I would have bet my life on that I would have whipped any lightweight that ever lived"...
          Gunstar your arguments are so easy to dismantle, it's almost boring, but you make it fun by coming back

          Comment

          • yrrej
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2006
            • 1728
            • 54
            • 0
            • 8,449

            #45
            Amateur or professional.....?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP