Who is the most "boring" fighter out of Wladimir Klitschko, Mayweather + Andre Ward?

[gamefrk]

in which world? In this world Klitschko holds infinitely more than Mayweather.

I;m not refuting what you have to say, both of them hold a ton.. Klitschko might at times make Floyd look like the most exciting fighter ever..but I picked Floyd to be the most boring because with Klitschko there is a huge sense of unpredictability..you never know when he KTFO's/KD's his man out.

[gamefrk]

Floyd, because Ward is willing to fight inside instead of just holding, although he does hold almost as much as Floyd does, he is more willing to keep his hands free to work as can bee seen in his fights with Dawson and Froch.

Wlad, while boring, usually delivers a fairly emphatic KO, which negates all the boringness, because you always know that KO is one punch away.

Floyd you basically know how every fight is going to go. There are never surprises. Its always the same thing on repeat.

Good points made here!

[Larry the boss]

Wlad............

[Gojira]

Ward by far. I don't watch his fights unless I think his opponent has a punchers chance to beat him.

[Fury4daWIN]

Wlad, by a country mile.

He's the only fighter of the three who consistently wins fights by fouling the crap out of his opponents. What he did in the Povetkin fight wasn't recognisably boxing. Even when he gets a stoppage it's not even exciting since the opponent either quits on their stool or just gets worn down to the point where they can't continue any more. The Pulev fight was the last time he really put on a show, but he has too many fights that follow the same tedious pattern.

Ward I actually find quite entertaining since he's so versatile, and can rough people up at the same time as he's outboxing them. He still clinches too much for my liking, but he at least works from the clinch and doesn't outright wrestle his opponents to the floor or try to jump on top of them every opportunity.

Mayweather doesn't float my boat, but he's not really boring so much as not particularly exciting. Still, his skill is something to be admired, and he doesn't clinch half so much as the above two.

[Syf]

Unfortunately, it's Floyd, especially since he has started holding and using spoiling tactics more as he ages. If he has his way, a fight will have zero excitement. Maidana 2... May-PAC... Ect. A student of the game can appreciate little nuances but Floyd's defensive jumbo jumbo becomes less impressive once you realize how much he holds intending to halt the flow of a fight.

Wlad has the ko factor going for him, but his tactics are typical.

Ward is busy, though some of his tactics are ugly, I haven't seen a boring Ward fight in a while.

All three put a casual to sleep though

[hectari]

Its a tie with floyd and wlad, but the only difference is wlad actually dominates guys and finishes them off, floyd seems to come to fights to survive and self preserve his health.

I never found ward to be all that boring, he reminds me of bradley not great at one thing but all around with little power. Also he actually throws more shots and combos, floyd doesn't, floyd is garbage hype job, he was only nice to watch when he was younger now he is just about taking money without putting on a show aka health comes first.

[jqSide]

You guys should have seen N'dam vs Lemieux.

[Monaco Slim]

Wladimir Klitschko is the most exciting, he always delivers great entrances and clean knockouts for the classy german boxing audience, not the peasants that show up to 700 seat bingo halls to watch Andre Ward win an ugly decision.

[maguirre]

They should just be given bums to make them exciting to watch. Otherwise, they would just run, hug, survive, and rip off paying viewers.