Comments Thread For: Khan: No Pay For Brook, Fought Bums His Whole Career

[Box-Office]

Like Collazo, Alexander, Algieri or whoever he refers to when he says: "I'm fighting world champions" and "I'm a world champion myself".

No Khan. They were champions. And you were a champion.

Where/when did he say that? Or is it where you tell me Diaz-Khan had free tickets given away, but no evidence as to how many or how Khan doesn't allow Brook Qs. Let's assume he said it, well it's obvious he is implying "former" Champs. Even a casual doesn't need figuring.

How many times do I have to tell you? I never count an alphabet org as a top 10? Why do you keep coming back to it. Only because you said Collazo was a top 10 fighter with the WBO.

Khan has 1 top 10 WW win in Alexander. The rest weren't ranked in the top 15.

Brook has Porter who was #4 in the division.

Doesn't matter, but curiously, which ranking are you talking about?

Remember that these rankings are made by nerds who've never actually been in the ring, well unless you want to count Fight Night. It's about resumes, but you know it doesn't fit your boy (nor it ever will), so you bring up mythical top 10s.

Anyways, calling Alvaro Robles "not top 10 and not World champ" doesn't change he is an utter BUM. Khan stopped fighting that level before he won the CMW title. Unless you now think Robles will "maul" Limond.

What does Haye-Enzo have to do with this? The situations are literally nothing alike at all.

Were you a boxing fan then? With a comment like that, I severely doubt it.

What's with you and Dirk always telling others (or at least me) they aren't real boxing fans? I don't mind it, but it sounds like primary school "you're ******, no you're ******, no youuuuuu" type of argument.

[LacedUp]

Yes, if Jones had success pinning Brook against the ropes, Porter should have no issue.

I've got Porter winning this.

Giving 4:1 odds.

Yoz before Brook beat Porter^^ Even giving 4:1 odds.

After:

Porter is nothing special.

Ah, boxing fans...

[LacedUp]

Where/when did he say that? Or is it where you tell me Diaz-Khan had free tickets given away, but no evidence as to how many or how Khan doesn't allow Brook Qs. Let's assume he said it, well it's obvious he is implying "former" Champs. Even a casual doesn't need figuring.

Doesn't matter, but curiously, which ranking are you talking about?

Remember that these rankings are made by nerds who've never actually been in the ring, well unless you want to count Fight Night. It's about resumes, but you know it doesn't fit your boy (nor it ever will), so you bring up mythical top 10s.

Anyways, calling Alvaro Robles "not top 10 and not World champ" doesn't change he is an utter BUM. Khan stopped fighting that level before he won the CMW title. Unless you now think Robles will "maul" Limond.

What's with you and Dirk always telling others (or at least me) they aren't real boxing fans? I don't mind it, but it sounds like primary school "you're ******, no you're ******, no youuuuuu" type of argument.

Mate, I don't care if you believe me or not They did give free tickets for the Diaz fight. A former colleague of mine from the Daily Star told me Khan specifically said he wouldn't bother answering questions about Brook.

I don't care what you think he's implying, and why would we "assume" it when it's in an article on fighthype? He's not fighting any world champions.

I'm talking about Ring magazine and TBRB.

To your comments about top 10s.. wtf. Seriously, you're slipping. "Player of the year" is also decided by journalists - I.e. people who've never been playing football. Or fight of the year in boxing- BWAA decides that. They don't know shyt either.

Really? What's the difference between Molina and Robles?

Because when you mention something like Haye-Maccarenelli I've got to question which state of mind you're in. Milk that win? I mean, you musn't have been around at that time - because it wasn't "milked" at all by anyone.

Plus Haye was already lineal + unified champion Absolutely no relevance.

[yoz]

Yoz before Brook beat Porter^^ Even giving 4:1 odds.

After:

Ah, boxing fans...

You're going to have try harder than that. So what if I fancied Porter to win? It was a comparative observation: Jones, like Porter, had a caveman-like, rough-and-ready style.

Kudos to Brook for beating him. I haven't, however, both prior or since, painted either fighter as a 'monster'. I don't hold either in particularly high estimation.

Your infatuation with Brook is disturbing. Worryingly so.

[Ham Porter]

Yes, although Danny got the KO, some posters here ignore the fact that Khan was landing at will.

To quote Max Kellerman, "Garcia's face is being raked up".

That said, a defeat is a defeat. Khan often dominates opponents, it's just when he deviates from his corner's set game plan that he finds himself in trouble.

Resume: Resume - Khan's is superior. There is no ground for debate.

"Landing at will" for a grand total of two rounds. Yeah, that's a lot to take credit from.

Khan doesn't deviate from any game plan, he's just a ridiculously one-dimensional and limited boxer with zero intelligence that's heavily reliant on his speed and getting off first.

[LacedUp]

You're going to have try harder than that. So what if I fancied Porter to win? It was a comparative observation: Jones, like Porter, had a caveman-like, rough-and-ready style.

Kudos to Brook for beating him. I haven't, however, both prior or since, painted either fighter as a 'monster'. I don't hold either in particularly high estimation.

Your infatuation with Brook is disturbing. Worryingly so.

mmh sure.

What's worrying is that you:

1) Picked Alexander to beat Porter
2) Picked Broner to beat Porter
3) Picked Porter to beat Brook

"Porter nothing special" doe

All of those were clear wins for the opposite guy and you won't give Porter credit for his wins or Brook credit for his win. That's embarrassing.

Where have I called Porter a 'monster'? I don't recall I've said that.

Well Porter keeps beating people you think he'll lose to Except for Brook of course. Maybe you should start giving people the respect they deserve.

[heihaci]

Khan's resume>>> Brook

[yoz]

mmh sure.

What's worrying is that you:

1) Picked Alexander to beat Porter
2) Picked Broner to beat Porter
3) Picked Porter to beat Brook

"Porter nothing special" doe

All of those were clear wins for the opposite guy and you won't give Porter credit for his wins or Brook credit for his win. That's embarrassing.

Where have I called Porter a 'monster'? I don't recall I've said that.

Well Porter keeps beating people you think he'll lose to Except for Brook of course. Maybe you should start getting people the respect they deserve.

I respect all boxers. But, just because they win one fight, I don't automatically '****ride' them.

Brook had problems with Jones, who shares some characteristics with Porter, so I fancied him to get the W. As I said before, kudos to Kell for getting the win. It doesn't, however, make him a 'monster'.

I rate Kell Brook, just like I rate Shawn Porter. They're just, in my opinion, not great - nor, as you put it, 'monsters'.

[witter87]

Khan get's asked a question about Brook or Mayweather and reply's and everybody gets mad what is he supposed to do say nothing?

Khan is right,Brook's resume is ****.Brook has been fighting at Welterweight for about 11 years,Khan 3 fights and they both have the same number of wins over a top 10 opponent Brook is just looking for a payday.Khan makes 1.5m a fight and i doubt Brook makes over 100k.if by next year whether he fights Mayweather or not he still won't fight Brook then that's when it will be clear he is ducking the fight,right now he is not because he is chasing a fight with the best in the division.

[LacedUp]

I respect all boxers. But, just because they win one fight, I don't automatically '****ride' them.

I rate Kell Brook, just like I rate Shawn Porter. They're just, in my opinion, not great - nor, as you put it, 'monsters'.

how do you rate Shawn Porter when you just said two minutes ago that he was nothing special?

Brook's a beast better believe he'll rip Khan if they fight.

I ask for the 5th time, where did I call Porter a monster?