I don't think Ali is ready for Thurman yet. Personally believe Thurman is the best Welterweight who doesn't have a "real" belt (Brook is a real threat) and isn't named Floyd, Juan, or Manny.
Sadam Ali should face Robert Guerrero or Diego Chaves so we can really judge him.
I don't think Ali is ready for Thurman yet. Personally believe Thurman is the best Welterweight who doesn't have a "real" belt (Brook is a real threat) and isn't named Floyd, Juan, or Manny.
Sadam Ali should face Robert Guerrero or Diego Chaves so we can really judge him.
I never said anything about Thurman. This is Porter vs Ali.
I'm not sure but I want to see it I think Sadam Ali maybe the darkhorse of the division. He doesn't get the credit of most but probably has a better win than most and the kid can box a bit.
People are quick to crown Broner, Spence, Thurman etc the next top American welterweight but it could well be T-Craw or this kid both of who IMO most are sleeping on.
I don't think he is great but he is certainly a solid little boxer who can make some noise.
Sadam Ali is talented, he's got very good skill. Quick feet, quick hands, good jab and good ring IQ. I think he's a bit chinny though. I've got him in my top 10 now, at #10, I dropped Guerrero out after his last performance.
If it goes the distance I think Ali could get the decision against Shawn.
Ali is a very bad choice for Porter. Ali is a very underrated counter puncher as we saw against Santana and moreso Abregu, he is very dangerous under pressure and can **** harder than Broner too.
I reckon he makes Porter walk straight into a hurtful counter and then finishes him off.
Comment