When will you give Brook the respect he deserves?

[Heavyfist]

Brook trying to fight Rios and glorified lightweight, instead of going after real welters like Thurman or Spence.

After all the bums Brook has been feasting on he is truly a fraud and a coward.

Brook probably has the worst resume of any belt holder in the last decade.

[LacedUp]

Brook trying to fight Rios and glorified lightweight, instead of going after real welters like Thurman or Spence.

After all the bums Brook has been feasting on he is truly a fraud and a coward.

Brook probably has the worst resume of any belt holder in the last decade.

Brook is the champ.

People should go after him. Go after Spence? You literally are ******ed.

[Heavyfist]

I can't decide who is more of a pathetic loser, Laceup or Larry?

We get it Lacedup you're a h0m0 for Brook. Stop repeating yourself you silly kunt.

You have over 15,000 posts. Go outside you pathetic little shlt.

[HanzGruber]

I just hope kell fights someone worthy of a title shot after rios

[Szef]

I'm not hating on that. But how is he number two when he lost to Marquez by nuke and Mayweather by lopsided decision? That makes no sense to me.

P4P Bradley. lol that was a myth. Whatever, not hating on Pacquiao. He's obviously a good fighter. Does he beat Kell Brook? Pff, not a chance in hell, but he's still good.

Just not the same Pacquiao who fought Cotto or Margarito even though some people still want to believe he is.

Because no WW hasn't had any win that would justify taking #2 from Pacquiao.

Shawn Porter is a good win and that's it, no matter how you spin it.

P4P Bradley is arguable I agree, but his win over Marquez shits on any name on Brook's resume. Pacquiao was and still is the only man who beat him.

Until Brook fights and beats another top WW he's below Pac.

Rios is a decent(ish) opponent, and that's it. Also, one could say that Brook is fighting Pacquiao's leftovers.

Brook is obviously good, but let's not get carried away here.

[LacedUp]

I can't decide who is more of a pathetic loser, Laceup or Larry?

We get it Lacedup you're a h0m0 for Brook. Stop repeating yourself you silly kunt.

You have over 15,000 posts. Go outside you pathetic little shlt.

Aaaand there goes the meltdown.

[John Locke]

I truly love Heavyfists, guy is absolutely mental

His posts have me rolling on the floor, he literally hates EVERY single fighter.

[LacedUp]

Because no WW hasn't had any win that would justify taking #2 from Pacquiao.

Shawn Porter is a good win and that's it, no matter how you spin it.

P4P Bradley is arguable I agree, but his win over Marquez shits on any name on Brook's resume. Pacquiao was and still is the only man who beat him.

Until Brook fights and beats another top WW he's below Pac.

Rios is a decent(ish) opponent, and that's it. Also, one could say that Brook is fighting Pacquiao's leftovers.

Brook is obviously good, but let's not get carried away here.

So you wouldn't say the guy who sparked him out cold did enough to be ranked above him? Come on.

If you want to "rank" Brook below Pacquiao be my guest. I don't care. There's no way in hell Pacquiao would beat Brook if they fought anytime in the future.

You'd be hard pressed to fight someone who isn't a leftover of someone else. Not bigging Rios up, he can get it too. He'll be beaten badly.

There's two WWs that could beat Brook right now. Mayweather would beat him without many problems. And potentially Keith Thurman but that's a 50/50 fight.

The rest would fall incl. Pacquiao or Bradley or whoever. Bradley had his chance to get a mandatory shot at Brook btw but went another route.

[Szef]

So you wouldn't say the guy who sparked him out cold did enough to be ranked above him? Come on.

If you want to "rank" Brook below Pacquiao be my guest. I don't care. There's no way in hell Pacquiao would beat Brook if they fought anytime in the future.

You'd be hard pressed to fight someone who isn't a leftover of someone else. Not bigging Rios up, he can get it too. He'll be beaten badly.

There's two WWs that could beat Brook right now. Mayweather would beat him without many problems. And potentially Keith Thurman but that's a 50/50 fight.

The rest would fall incl. Pacquiao or Bradley or whoever. Bradley had his chance to get a mandatory shot at Brook btw but went another route.

Again, until he beats one of the guys you mentioned, Kell Brook is still a belt holder with only one decent win on his resume.

Hypothetical wins are well, hypothetical.

[SkillspayBills]

I do find it quite amusing people putting porter forward as an option for Mayweather while the guy who beat him handily is mentioned by nobody.

good win by porter tonight and he's on the road back, but not enough to pull ahead of the guy who beat him. If porter had another couple of top wins and brook only beats bums in that time maybe we can talk, but as it stands Brook is rightfully higher ranked and in a more deserving position to fight Floyd.

Porter did nothing tonight to suggest he'd beat brook in a rematch.

That's because while Floyd has been relaxing Brook has almost finished a deal that will bring him Brandon Rios.