Originally posted by Crazylegs77
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
You know, golovkin is getting pretty close to breaking Wilfredo Gomez's record
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by PK3434 View PostI am a Golovkin fan (I don't understand how anyone that likes boxing wouldn't be) and I would be disappointed if he fought someone in that Monroe, Heiland, Johnson group. However, what if nobody else wants to fight him? Then should he just sit out and wait until next year? Even if he moves up, who at 168 really wants a piece of him this fall?
Comment
-
Originally posted by T18Z View PostThen what is your point? They are fighters moving up that have been previously ranked within the top 20's and faced some good opposition. Rosado held a #1 IBF JMW ranking and could've fought for a title but instead decided to go up and fight Golovkin.
Who had Rod Salka fought before Garcia? What was his rankings in other divisions?
Shut the hell up, fool.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Barcham View PostBut Ward deserves no share of the blame because he wants tune up fights before even talking about a GGG fight? As for Cotto, I don't give a **** if he was 5 feet tall and 98 pounds. He holds the MIDDLEWEIGHT WBC AND RING TITLES and Golovkin is his legitimate MANDATORY challenger. Either he fights GGG or he vacates his title. And GGG in no way, shape or form is trying to fight Mayweather. You must be one of those people who took that TMZ video of Oscar to be 100% serious as well.
And yeah, it's time you actually recognize things for what they really are, not for what fools try to spin them into.
again, you did this in another thread like a child. i think it's my avatar. i haven't had those things turned on in years.
you can go ahead and read my posts concerning andre ward, if you'd like.
as for golovkin trying to fight floyd mayweather, here you go:
he's not trying to get the most lucritive fight in the world for him in spite of the fact that he's saying he wants it, and it is the most lucrative possible fight
you're probably some dude i bufu'd in another thread. continue to look at my andre ward avatar and respond to it like a child. that's what all the top posters do when they see me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postagain, you did this in another thread like a child. i think it's my avatar. i haven't had those things turned on in years.
you can go ahead and read my posts concerning andre ward, if you'd like.
as for golovkin trying to fight floyd mayweather, here you go:
he's not trying to get the most lucritive fight in the world for him in spite of the fact that he's saying he wants it, and it is the most lucrative possible fight
you're probably some dude i bufu'd in another thread. continue to look at my andre ward avatar and respond to it like a child. that's what all the top posters do when they see me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by New England View Postgomez, IIRC, was the lineal champion [the soul, recognized champion.]
i know that the WBA / WBC had fractured the world championship belt by the 70's, but i'm pretty sure that gomez established legitimate lineage and was ring mag champion when he beat the korean bloke for the 122 lb title.
golovkin is an alphabet soup champion. he's the best fighter at 160 according to anybody with a working set of eyeballs, but he's not the legit champ.
the legit champ is miguel cotto. he beat martinez. martinez beat pavlik. pavlik beat taylor. taylor beat hopkins. you can't get a more lineal champion than bernard hopkins at MW. dude was the definition of lineage, which he established when he boxed off for a vacant lineage against tito trinidad in '01.
As a HUGE tangent though, I find the idea of championship inherently flawed. The idea that one, as a (lineal) champion, is better (or even more comparable to past fighters) than a guy who is practically the consensus best of the division, just because he is the (lineal) champion seems absurd to me.
Its a flawed system, as championships can never really follow consensus indefinitely. The lineal system is far better than the ABC titles, as it follows consensus much more often, but I don't believe it should be taken at face value alone as it often fails too. GGG/Cotto, Huck/Hernandez are prime examples, but even ones such as Gonzales/Estrada provoke some discussion.
Comment
-
Comment