Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Guerrero: Mayweather Won Easy, Speed Froze Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Weebler I View Post
    This is true, but that shouldn't be the case. It's not right to score a round through that prism[B]. The guy who lands the more effective (i.e. harder) punches should win the round, period.




    Yes, and that guy was Mayweather. So keep crying Weebler. You and the rest of the pathetic brigade who pick against Mayweather but rewrite history after every one of his fights. Like clockwork.

    Comment


    • #82
      i say this fight was won with simple foot work/placement whats where pac looked amature

      Comment


      • #83
        Robert Guerrero>>>Manny Pacquiao

        Comment


        • #84
          In no way shape or form was either fighter dominant.

          I recently rewatched it on mute and scored it a draw. The commentary was highly biased.

          Don't care how many people laugh etc, I watched it objectively, Pacquiao's defence was excellent and Floyd's jab was superb.

          It was a very close fight.

          Mock me all you want I don't give a fk, the fight was a draw or 7-5 either way on my card and I want to see a rematch.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Hype job View Post
            In no way shape or form was either fighter dominant.

            I recently rewatched it on mute and scored it a draw. The commentary was highly biased.

            Don't care how many people laugh etc, I watched it objectively, Pacquiao's defence was excellent and Floyd's jab was superb.

            It was a very close fight.

            Mock me all you want I don't give a fk, the fight was a draw or 7-5 either way on my card and I want to see a rematch.
            Of course you did. Of course you did.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
              Of course you did. Of course you did.
              I did.

              The fight will be seen in a more objective light in the future.

              Because PAC fought a certain way due to his gameplan, this was interpreted as Floyd making him fight that way, when it was just the gameplan. Pac's underrated defence meant Floyd got credit for punches that weren't clean and very iffy.

              I'm 100% honest here I saw a close fight, don't know wtf people are talking about when they say it was a domination, nothing of the sort. The commentators (American and British) gave people a narrative from the opening bell that swayed peoples perceptions of what was happening, it's not the first time I or anyone else has been swayed by commentators. Froch Groves 1 is a perfect example of how badly biased commentary can fk up your perception.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by MisanthropicNY View Post
                Gurrero fell for the same deception millions of others did: Mayweather's speed was so fast MOST didn't realize that his PUNCHES WERE NOT Landing on Pacquiao. Pacquiao blocked about 90% of Mayweather's shots with his gloves and arms. The other 10% of Mayweather's landed shots were shots that didn't fully connect... Pacquiao didn't do that much either, but he did more than Mayweather and clearly dominated at least two rounds..

                Pac landed more shots, the better-harder shots, and was the aggressor in more rounds.

                If you haven't watched the fight in slow motion please do so, it's pretty clear that Mayweather did not land anywhere near what compubox stated (See Cotto v. Mayweather fight as well where there are clear rounds where compubox was just so off target with its punch totals it's beyond laughable.)

                To beat Mayweather in Vegas, you have to dominate the round..you can't just win..but the Slow motion replay of May-Pac clearly shows Pac the winner. And this isn't the first time Mayweather has lost a fight either: See Castillo 1 and Maidana 1
                Jesus man **** off already

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                  Jesus man **** off already
                  He actually made some very good points. If you weren't a fanboy you wouldn't be so dismissive.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Hype job View Post
                    I did.

                    The fight will be seen in a more objective light in the future.

                    Because PAC fought a certain way due to his gameplan, this was interpreted as Floyd making him fight that way, when it was just the gameplan. Pac's underrated defence meant Floyd got credit for punches that weren't clean and very iffy.

                    I'm 100% honest here I saw a close fight, don't know wtf people are talking about when they say it was a domination, nothing of the sort. The commentators (American and British) gave people a narrative from the opening bell that swayed peoples perceptions of what was happening, it's not the first time I or anyone else has been swayed by commentators. Froch Groves 1 is a perfect example of how badly biased commentary can fk up your perception.
                    Looooooooooooooooooool

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Guerrero should know a little something about Mayweather's speed. If Manny was frozen, Guerrero's feet must have been encased in cement when he fought Floyd. FOH, "ghost".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP