Comments Thread For: Guerrero: Mayweather Won Easy, Speed Froze Pacquiao

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joseph5620
    undisputed
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 15610
    • 3,070
    • 5,639
    • 71,615

    #81
    Originally posted by Weebler I
    This is true, but that shouldn't be the case. It's not right to score a round through that prism[B]. The guy who lands the more effective (i.e. harder) punches should win the round, period.




    Yes, and that guy was Mayweather. So keep crying Weebler. You and the rest of the pathetic brigade who pick against Mayweather but rewrite history after every one of his fights. Like clockwork.

    Comment

    • 12TRIBEsRiSe
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2012
      • 4772
      • 136
      • 212
      • 11,191

      #82
      i say this fight was won with simple foot work/placement whats where pac looked amature

      Comment

      • GRUSTLER
        Undisputed champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 14118
        • 444
        • 115
        • 20,934

        #83
        Robert Guerrero>>>Manny Pacquiao

        Comment

        • Hype job
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2014
          • 10667
          • 728
          • 1,404
          • 43,949

          #84
          In no way shape or form was either fighter dominant.

          I recently rewatched it on mute and scored it a draw. The commentary was highly biased.

          Don't care how many people laugh etc, I watched it objectively, Pacquiao's defence was excellent and Floyd's jab was superb.

          It was a very close fight.

          Mock me all you want I don't give a fk, the fight was a draw or 7-5 either way on my card and I want to see a rematch.

          Comment

          • b00g13man
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2012
            • 12197
            • 265
            • 51
            • 34,905

            #85
            Originally posted by Hype job
            In no way shape or form was either fighter dominant.

            I recently rewatched it on mute and scored it a draw. The commentary was highly biased.

            Don't care how many people laugh etc, I watched it objectively, Pacquiao's defence was excellent and Floyd's jab was superb.

            It was a very close fight.

            Mock me all you want I don't give a fk, the fight was a draw or 7-5 either way on my card and I want to see a rematch.
            Of course you did. Of course you did.

            Comment

            • Hype job
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2014
              • 10667
              • 728
              • 1,404
              • 43,949

              #86
              Originally posted by b00g13man
              Of course you did. Of course you did.
              I did.

              The fight will be seen in a more objective light in the future.

              Because PAC fought a certain way due to his gameplan, this was interpreted as Floyd making him fight that way, when it was just the gameplan. Pac's underrated defence meant Floyd got credit for punches that weren't clean and very iffy.

              I'm 100% honest here I saw a close fight, don't know wtf people are talking about when they say it was a domination, nothing of the sort. The commentators (American and British) gave people a narrative from the opening bell that swayed peoples perceptions of what was happening, it's not the first time I or anyone else has been swayed by commentators. Froch Groves 1 is a perfect example of how badly biased commentary can fk up your perception.

              Comment

              • Larry the boss
                EDUCATED
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2011
                • 90798
                • 6,419
                • 4,473
                • 2,500,480

                #87
                Originally posted by MisanthropicNY
                Gurrero fell for the same deception millions of others did: Mayweather's speed was so fast MOST didn't realize that his PUNCHES WERE NOT Landing on Pacquiao. Pacquiao blocked about 90% of Mayweather's shots with his gloves and arms. The other 10% of Mayweather's landed shots were shots that didn't fully connect... Pacquiao didn't do that much either, but he did more than Mayweather and clearly dominated at least two rounds..

                Pac landed more shots, the better-harder shots, and was the aggressor in more rounds.

                If you haven't watched the fight in slow motion please do so, it's pretty clear that Mayweather did not land anywhere near what compubox stated (See Cotto v. Mayweather fight as well where there are clear rounds where compubox was just so off target with its punch totals it's beyond laughable.)

                To beat Mayweather in Vegas, you have to dominate the round..you can't just win..but the Slow motion replay of May-Pac clearly shows Pac the winner. And this isn't the first time Mayweather has lost a fight either: See Castillo 1 and Maidana 1
                Jesus man **** off already

                Comment

                • Hype job
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2014
                  • 10667
                  • 728
                  • 1,404
                  • 43,949

                  #88
                  Originally posted by LarryXXX
                  Jesus man **** off already
                  He actually made some very good points. If you weren't a fanboy you wouldn't be so dismissive.

                  Comment

                  • b00g13man
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 12197
                    • 265
                    • 51
                    • 34,905

                    #89
                    Originally posted by Hype job
                    I did.

                    The fight will be seen in a more objective light in the future.

                    Because PAC fought a certain way due to his gameplan, this was interpreted as Floyd making him fight that way, when it was just the gameplan. Pac's underrated defence meant Floyd got credit for punches that weren't clean and very iffy.

                    I'm 100% honest here I saw a close fight, don't know wtf people are talking about when they say it was a domination, nothing of the sort. The commentators (American and British) gave people a narrative from the opening bell that swayed peoples perceptions of what was happening, it's not the first time I or anyone else has been swayed by commentators. Froch Groves 1 is a perfect example of how badly biased commentary can fk up your perception.
                    Looooooooooooooooooool

                    Comment

                    • SUBZER0ED
                      Be water, my friend.
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2013
                      • 11269
                      • 2,508
                      • 1,911
                      • 34,667

                      #90
                      Guerrero should know a little something about Mayweather's speed. If Manny was frozen, Guerrero's feet must have been encased in cement when he fought Floyd. FOH, "ghost".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP