Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Cotto: GGG Never Beat Top Foe, Canelo Failed To Shine!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
    Somebody didn't read my post properly before they responded. I said Ward needs Golovkin more than Golovkin needs him. You get a zero for the day. Damn near nobody wants to fight GGG because he's a beast. If you want to try to twist that around to make it seem like He's ducking, put together a list of the many big names who are calling him out. I dare you.

    Golovkin is the number one MW contender. Cotto is the WBC MW champion. Why the hell wouldn't they fight?? Last time I checked, this was a competitive sport.
    Golovkin, is affectionately known as " hypekin ", for the following reason.....

    ..... because he does not have anyone of Wards calibre on his resume.



    Sanchez talks about earning respect.

    Ward has respect.

    Ward has respect because he fought and beat the best.

    The best is Ward.

    If Hypekin beats Froch, he is one fight away from either.....
    1) his first loss
    2) an inexcusable duck that will follow him forever

    Leave a comment:


  • PeasantCrusha
    replied
    Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing View Post
    How is someone supposed to face a Class "A" opponent, when the Class "A" opponents don't want to give them a shot in the first place. LOL Cotto is hilarious!!
    What puzzles me is WHO is keeping GGG and Canelo from fighting one another? I keep hearing about both GGG and Mr. 155 are struggling for "class A " opponents... What gives. Does GGG not have Canelo's contact info? Oh wait, that's right... Nelo is NOT a MW doe.



    Also, if according to Team Peasant, Cotto is EASY for both GGG and Mr. 155, how are we then claiming that somehow Cotto is the guy they need to get their overdue props?


    Buncha feminine "we hate Cotto," peasants

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by OnePunch View Post
    maybe GGG should follow the "cotto blueprint" and go get a title at 168 and then fight Ward at 164 since "ggg small super middleweight doe".

    Oh wait, to follow the cotto blueprint would not be to fight Froch,Ward, Dirrell, etc at all, but instead to fight someone like Stiglitz or Sturm at 162
    That is exactly what I think will happen.

    If they fight Froch and beat him, I can absolutely see Sanchez demanding a catchweight for Ward - effectively ending negotiations.

    You were joking, but I think that is a highly likely scenario.

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by nerd slapper View Post
    Beating a guy his own size whos on a hot streak like Canelo or Lemiuex would be "validation".

    Moving up and beating Ward would be more than validation, it would make Golovkin the best boxer in the world.

    As far as Cotto, probably all he's interested in is keeping that paper title long enough to hand it to Floyd for 50 million dollars.
    You are an absololute fanboy, and obviously madly in love with Golovkin.

    Why do you kids need to do that ******ed shht ?

    It is clearly obvious that Cotto is not a genuine middleweight, and not Golovkins "own size".

    So, because of the importance of fairness GGG cannot fight a larger opponent, despite his trainer saying "anyone from 154-168"...... and yet with Cotto, close enough is ok, right ?

    * Cotto is not a genuine MW, but he will fight there if suitable (Geale)
    * Golovkin is not a genuine SMW, but he will fight there is suitable (Froch)

    * Cotto will fight Canelo, and lesser opponents, but not Golovkin
    * Golovkin will fight Froch, and lesser opponents, but not Ward

    It is exactly the same situation, except that Cotto is a proven veteran, and Golovkin is not.

    Keep sucking those GGG balls son.

    Leave a comment:


  • KO MX
    replied
    there is something wrong when you talk about yourself in third person

    Leave a comment:


  • WalkerSmith1921
    replied
    Originally posted by skinnystev View Post
    cotto has lost by KO to a blown up junior welterweight thats his legacy
    Pacquiao also lost by KO to a blown up lightweight and that's his legacy. lmfao

    My fault I meant to say a blown up featherweight which is even worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjavi973
    replied
    Originally posted by nerd slapper View Post
    Doesn't matter if you "listed them", his record lists them and that was what he did at 154. His career is a joke.
    That's your opinion. Top 5 from 2010:
    1. Cintron
    2. Angulo
    3. Cotto
    4. Rhodes
    5. Powell

    Top 5 2011:
    1. Cotto
    2. Canelo
    3. Martirosyan
    4. Lara
    5. Molina

    Then in 2012 he lost to floyd & then lost to trout. For that you think his career is a joke? You're reaching.

    I didn't list them for a reason.

    Leave a comment:


  • ////
    replied
    Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
    I never listed Foreman or Mayorga quit reaching.
    Doesn't matter if you "listed them", his record lists them and that was what he did at 154. His career is a joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • ////
    replied
    When you compare Geale to Cotto's previous opposition (not counting his losses), he's actually going to be one of his toughest opponents.

    Yes he's still Golovkin's destroyed leftovers forced down to a catchweight. But compared to crippled sergio, crippled yuri, part time mma fighter mayorga, etc, Geale would be one of the best wins of Cotto's career next to Mosely.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjavi973
    replied
    Originally posted by nerd slapper View Post
    Nobody man he fcked em all up, knee surgery Yuri Foreman, part time MMA fighter with losing record Ricardo Mayorga, Cotto BORICUAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FIGHT ANYONE KING WARRIOR

    Only his middleweight domination is more impressive than his HOF 154 streak. If the judges didn't rob him against Trout I would consider him undefeated.
    I never listed Foreman or Mayorga quit reaching.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP