Who would enhance Mayweather's legacy most? Khan or Brook?

[sparkman0811]

Neither, don't think much of either guy honestly. The thing is Mayweather's legacy is sealed after the Pacquiao fight, you can't really get better than that, with some few and obvious exceptions. But, I'm not one of the guys calling for that Golovkin-Mayweather fight, it's a ridiculous fight given the size difference.

[Legacy]

there's no doubt in my mind that he'll fight brook...

he gets much more out of it and he's shown that he'll always choose the better guy in terms of belts and such....

brook is that guy....khan is not..

[////]

All Brook has to offer is a belt

And that belt is pretty mediocre:
http://boxrec.com/title_search.php?t...ight&SUBMIT=Go

[////]

there's no doubt in my mind that he'll fight brook...

he gets much more out of it and he's shown that he'll always choose the better guy in terms of belts and such....

brook is that guy....khan is not..

is that you in your avatar?

[arraamis]

All Brook has to offer is a belt

And that belt is pretty mediocre:
http://boxrec.com/title_search.php?t...ight&SUBMIT=Go

Don't attempt to diminish Brook just to elevate the Khan-man.

Brook has the only loose WW belt out there and has been able to pack in a good UK crowd at each of his outings. It can\will be billed as a WW unification bout against an undefeated UK fighter.

Meanwhile .... Khan-man is getting sorry numbers in each of his outings, including his failed attempt to headline. Add to that the absence of a belt and we are left with the question ... What does Khan-man bring to the table?

Speed?!?!? That wasn't useful against Algeri.

This shit that you guys are putting in print is rich.

[Legacy]

is that you in your avatar?

why wouldn't it be?

[Box-Office]

Brook: Senchenko, Porter, world title
Khan: Diaz, Collazo, Alexander, Algieri

Depends what you like really, Brook fight would've been worth more if Floyd hadn't relinquished his WBO title, could've been unified champ.

LOL.

I like how you pick Brook's best wins minus the last 3 jokers he'll be fighting up till Mayweather and for Khan you take the last 4. Fact is at this point Porter win is irrelevant.

[Box-Office]

Don't attempt to diminish Brook just to elevate the Khan-man.

Brook has the only loose WW belt out there and has been able to pack in a good UK crowd at each of his outings. It can\will be billed as a WW unification bout against an undefeated UK fighter.

Meanwhile .... Khan-man is getting sorry numbers in each of his outings, including his failed attempt to headline. Add to that the absence of a belt and we are left with the question ... What does Khan-man bring to the table?

Speed?!?!? That wasn't useful against Algeri.

This shit that you guys are putting in print is rich.

Khan-Algieri did around 1.2 million viewers for Algieri. That is double than that of Brook-Porter with 660k. In fact less than Garcia-Salka. It is sort of a forecast for PPV sales.

[LacedUp]

LOL.

I like how you pick Brook's best wins minus the last 3 jokers he'll be fighting up till Mayweather and for Khan you take the last 4. Fact is at this point Porter win is irrelevant.

How is the Porter win irrelevant? Especially compared to such wins like Algieri and Alexander

[Box-Office]

How is the Porter win irrelevant? Especially compared to such wins like Algieri and Alexander

It was a year and 3 fights ago. You are only as good as your last win. Algieri fight is a reflection of Khan just as Rios will be for Brook.

"Maidana was 10 years ago doe".