Everyone keeps saying that Khan has been avoiding punchers and maybe he has but it doesn't mean Brook has the right to do the same. Porter was always overhyped and has strength rather than power. He has a 59% KO ratio and didnt have a knockout in 2 years till he fought an old man in Malignaggi. Brook's been rocked by Senchenko who is also not a big puncher. Stop criticising your rival who as of now has accomplished more than you, and the blown up welter in Julio Diaz drew with Porter (your best win) and many thought he won.Kell Brook who I believe could very well beat Khan and take over WW should stop talking about this fight and go and fight some other marquee names if he doesn't need Khan. Eddie Hearn talks so much bollocks, we don't need Khan an then he goes off on Alexander (2 division world champ), Collazo (former top contender coming off solid win and Thurman's next opponent), Julio Diaz (former world champ) and Algieri (former world champ) who all beat Gavin and no no Dan.
Amir Khan maybe "ducking" but build yourselves a good resume without Khan then, hypocrisy at it's best.
Don't get me wrong I rate Brook and I see him beating Rios pretty comfortably and fancy him over Thurman but his chin has not even been tested yet...unless you count Carson Jones and Senchenko.
For everyone too lazy to read: Khan may be duckig punchers but Brook hasn't even fought one!
Carson Jones?
Comment