-
-
Did you even read my first post? I said Brook may beat Khan and also replied to someone saying that Brook has the best boxing foundation other than Floyd. Man I clearly overestimated your ability to comprehend a thread. This is not discrediting Brook but exposing holes which are yet to be filled. I've acknowledged that Khan may lose and I said Matthysse murders him, these Brook fanboys are getting Khaninsons's syndrome. Maybe I'll come up with a cure for this one day.How would we know? He was buckled and hurt by Chris Algieri in the first round of their fight ffs.
Floyd's mandatory
Yeah - you really understand boxing.
You've been riding Khan hard lately. Pretty pathetic. Instead of making excuses, why don't you just ask him why he doesn't want to fight Brook?
Deep down, Khan fanboys are petrified too that Brook would beat the living crap out of their boy and end his career - for good this time.Comment
-
No I didn't. Because at some stage it leads to discrediting Brook - like your headline.
Which holes? He fought Porter who everybody thought would beat him. Now of course Porter is a nobody. Unlike Devon Alexander who magically turned into a BETTER win than Porter even though Porter just smashed the living sht out of him
Comment
-
Aww, bless your cotton socks for trying. Gavin can't punch for ****, lost to Skeete and beaten by European level Bundu. Well done for trying.Comment
-
You Clearly didnt watch Porter Alexander, nothing happened and no smashing. Alexander did nothing and Porter did slightly more. Carry on living in your bubble. Brook will win everyone over once he fights an established puncher. Not a Porter with 59% ko.No I didn't. Because at some stage it leads to discrediting Brook - like your headline.
Which holes? He fought Porter who everybody thought would beat him. Now of course Porter is a nobody. Unlike Devon Alexander who magically turned into a BETTER win than Porter even though Porter just smashed the living sht out of himComment
-
Didn't senchenko knock out Ricky Hatton with a body shot?
Everyone keeps saying that Khan has been avoiding punchers and maybe he has but it doesn't mean Brook has the right to do the same. Porter was always overhyped and has strength rather than power. He has a 59% KO ratio and didnt have a knockout in 2 years till he fought an old man in Malignaggi. Brook's been rocked by Senchenko who is also not a big puncher. Stop criticising your rival who as of now has accomplished more than you, and the blown up welter in Julio Diaz drew with Porter (your best win) and many thought he won.
Kell Brook who I believe could very well beat Khan and take over WW should stop talking about this fight and go and fight some other marquee names if he doesn't need Khan. Eddie Hearn talks so much bollocks, we don't need Khan an then he goes off on Alexander (2 division world champ), Collazo (former top contender coming off solid win and Thurman's next opponent), Julio Diaz (former world champ) and Algieri (former world champ) who all beat Gavin and no no Dan.
Amir Khan maybe "ducking" but build yourselves a good resume without Khan then, hypocrisy at it's best.
Don't get me wrong I rate Brook and I see him beating Rios pretty comfortably and fancy him over Thurman but his chin has not even been tested yet...unless you count Carson Jones and Senchenko.
For everyone too lazy to read: Khan may be duckig punchers but Brook hasn't even fought one!Comment
-
FLOYD MAYWEATHER (US)
WON TITLE: September 17, 2011
LAST DEFENSE:May 2, 2015
Contenders:
WBC SILVER CHAMPION:Amir Khan (GB)
WBC INT. CHAMPION:Charles Manyuchi
1 .- Amir Khan (GB) SILVER
2 .- Antonin Decarie (Canada)
3 .- Marcos Maidana (Argentina)
Thanks, truth hurt you? Khan is mandatory to Floyd's WBC welterweight championship. Source: WBC website.Comment
Tweet
Comment