IF ggg beats froch...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589

    #21
    I think he is absolutely the best 160 pounder. What middleweight can even come close to beating him? Cotto would be about a 20 to 1 under dog if he ever agreed to fight GGG but he won't ever do that. Froch is easy to hit and Taylor hurt Froch badly although Froch hung in there to win. GGG hits with much more power than Taylor and he doesn't stop punching. I will put a big bet on GGG to beat Froch if they fight at 168.

    Comment

    • b00g13man
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2012
      • 12197
      • 265
      • 51
      • 34,905

      #22
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      If he beats a 168lb fighter at 168lbs, where would you rank him at 160lbs?

      That's actually your question?
      Lol. I know right?

      Comment

      • nivek535
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2013
        • 2685
        • 104
        • 212
        • 9,740

        #23
        are u guys ******? lol....

        Comment

        • boliodogs
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2008
          • 33358
          • 824
          • 1,782
          • 309,589

          #24
          GGG would beat Froch in my opinion. But he doesn't need to beat a top 168 pounder to prove he is the best middleweight in the world because damn near everybody already knows he is the best 160 pounder in the world. What middleweight would beat GGG? Cotto, Kid Chocolate, Andy Lee or The hard punching Canadian? They are all good fighters and GGG knocks them all out. The hardest part for GGG is getting the top guys to fight him. Knocking them all out is the easy part. He is ranked number 1 by Boxing Scene, Boxrec and just about any other organization that ranks fighters.

          Comment

          • Redd Foxx
            Hittin' the heavy bag.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 22007
            • 1,180
            • 2,316
            • 1,257,197

            #25
            Originally posted by nivek535
            bunch of idiotic responses lol
            If your candy azz can't handle getting called out for posting ****** shyt, then try staying quiet. It's a discussion, debate your point or quit but don't cry about it.

            Comment

            • bojangles1987
              bo jungle
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2009
              • 41118
              • 1,326
              • 357
              • 63,028

              #26
              Originally posted by -MAKAVELLI-
              if GGG decisively beats Froch, he might as well stay at 168 because he's not getting any fights at 160
              Pretty much. Even beating this Cobra would scare 160 ****less.

              Comment

              • Earl-Hickey
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 29031
                • 2,832
                • 1,384
                • 297,750

                #27
                He's light years behind Hagler, light years.

                I mean come on now

                Comment

                • Rip Chudd
                  1 John 2:22
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 22689
                  • 1,932
                  • 1,321
                  • 260,351

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                  If he beats a 168lb fighter at 168lbs, where would you rank him at 160lbs?

                  That's actually your question?
                  I always enjoy your posts.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP