IF ggg beats froch...

[nivek535]

BIG IF, but
if ggg beats froch decisively whether by wide UD or KO, how would you rank him amongst the 160ers??

[-MAKAVELLI-]

if GGG decisively beats Froch, he might as well stay at 168 because he's not getting any fights at 160

[nivek535]

if GGG decisively beats Froch, he might as well stay at 168 because he's not getting any fights at 160

what i mean is,
right now everyone says he cannot be even compared to hagler. is he comparable then?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

If he beats a 168lb fighter at 168lbs, where would you rank him at 160lbs?

That's actually your question?

[-MAKAVELLI-]

what i mean is,
right now everyone says he cannot be even compared to hagler. is he comparable then?

well, what he does in another division doesnt really do anything for his 160 legacy

[Santa_]

He will be considered the best fighter at 168 if he beats Froch.


(We all know Ward can't make 168 anymore)
.

[The Champions]

what i mean is,
right now everyone says he cannot be even compared to hagler. is he comparable then?

Beating Froch does not compare GGG to Hagler.

Froch is there to be had in my opinion....but so is GGG.

[The Champions]

He will be considered the best fighter at 168 if he beats Froch.


(We all know Ward can't make 168 anymore)
.

lol @ The way mexicans suck off GGG

How do "we" know Ward can't make 168 anymore??

[Caught Square]

Exactly the same as how I rank him at 160 now.

[Redd Foxx]

what i mean is,
right now everyone says he cannot be even compared to hagler. is he comparable then?

ONE fight against a quality opponent and suddenly he's in the conversation with Haggler?? Come on now, you know better than that.