After Broner schools Porter is he back in contentition for the p4p top 10

[Dirk Diggler UK]

It was a clear win for Brook, I'm not denying that, but it was hardly a "schooling". A schooling is when a guy is boxing circles around a guy from round 1 to 12. Brook separated himself with the clearer and more precise punches, but if Brook/Porter is considered a schooling then we need to rethink the definition of that term.

Mayweather produces similar performances all the time and they get branded the same way. When you land all the clean punches and your opponent lands nothing, to me that's a schooling. Porter looked like than that guy in your sig

[Mike D]

Porter looked like than that guy in your sig

The guy in my sig is arguably an ATG, leave him out of this.

[HEND]

Or some people don't know what they're watching. Wading in like a caveman and smothering all your own work is not a scoring criteria to win rounds.

Brook-Porter was not a close fight. I had it 9-3 on second sober viewing. Brook made him look like a rank amateur.

9-3, ok, lmao...
It surely wasn't that wide neither it was a schooling. But whatever if you want to believe that it was a masterclass schooling then believe it.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

9-3, ok, lmao...
It surely wasn't that wide neither it was a schooling. But whatever if you want to believe that it was a masterclass schooling then believe it.

Watch it again. You can count the amount of punches Shawn Porter landed on one hand in 12 rounds. 9-3, 8-4 at worst.

Brook looked like a pristine, clean, accurate boxer and Porter looked like he'd never boxed in his life. He got completely outclassed.

[Derranged]

Sit your british ass down i'm me you b**** dont go talking s***. Your boy beat porter then everyone acted like hes the confermed truth but Broner beating him means nothing???

Clown.

Thing is Broner most likely gets manhandled by Porter. I can't see how he'd win.

[Chrismart]

Nah. He needs back to back good wins to be considered again. The 2 Molina's and Taylor don't cut it.
He's trying to stack the odds in his favour against Porter with the catch-weight and the rehydration clause. But i still wouldn't bet on him winning.

[boliodogs]

There are too many boxers fighting today that are so much better than Broner for him to be in the top 10 pfp in the world even if he knocks Porter out in the first round. You talk like Broner is a sure thing to beat Porter. The odds makers who handicap fighters for a living don't agree with you. Porter is the betting favorite and is the man they think will win. If someone bets on Porter they have to bet $150 to win $100. If someone bets $100 on Broner they win $120 if he wins. So if you are that sure Broner will win you should bet some money on him because the odds are in your favor. I think Porter wins this fight.

[samouraļ]

Unless Porter is drained he's going to kill Broner. Either way though, Broner is not P4P material.

[Dean_Razorback]

Is this Webb/Inkayamba back on the scene?

Kell Brook already schooled Porter....for a world title....at his natural weight. He must be P4P top 5 then.

Broner trying his best to drain people with names. Why doesn't he fight someone decent at 140 if he is going to campaign there?

he could also be brushmyhair, the only hardcore broner fan on nsb, the word nation on his name makes me think so too.

[DreamerUSA]

He does'nt belonganywhere near the top ten even if he beats, Porter, which I doubt. If Broner wants to be in the top ten p4p he needs to start clearing out 140 and quit ****ing with welterweights. Sadly. A lot of the better fights at 140 will be tough to get made.