Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tim Bradley>>>>>Wladimir Klitschko??????WTF

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Wladimers resume underrated I think, Haye would be a tough match for most heavyweights in history and Wlad handled him with relative ease.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by yaltamaltadavid View Post
      Neither of them is on a credible p4p top 10. It's no knock against Klit to not highly rate a heavyweight champ in a weak era who wins mostly with his size. Bradley's limitations are obvious and his results far from dominant. I'd say it's fair enough to have them both around 30. It's the best fighters in May 2015, not a career accomplishments list. Pac and Marquez also shouldn't be top 10 p4p. Thurman and Brook would beat Pac, Marquez, and Bradley so they should be regarded as greater fighters p4p right now.

      Here's what I have...

      Mayweather
      Rigondeaux
      Gonzalez
      Ward
      Lomachenko
      Crawford
      Inoue
      Estrada
      Golovkin
      Kovalev
      You seriously have Ward and Lomachenko over Golovkin? Seriously?

      Ward hasn't been active and I don't care who says what, his fight style is worse than Floyd's. Absolutely boring to watch that dude.

      I'm a Lomachenko fan but he was humbled by Salido and a crooked ref.

      As far as Bradley I think the reason he's up there on the P4P is because of the "pound for pound" marker. Within the weight classes he boxes in he's, by the numbers, superior to everyone except Floyd and Manny. We're not talking about subjective "I think" maneuvers. By the numbers, he's up there.

      For that reason I think Golovkin should be much higher by now. I think what's happening there is that he's not jumping weight classes.

      Comment


      • #23
        If Wlad didn't resurrect his career fighting bums in Germany with his personal K2 refs he wouldn't have even been pro anymore.

        Comment


        • #24
          Wlad's vast repertoire of skills include a total of 3 different punches(exclusively towards the head) usually only one punch at a time and some greco roman manoeuvres.

          Comment


          • #25
            The stuff of P4P legends:

            Comment


            • #26
              Pound for pound can't be proven and is just a matter of personal opinion. Anybody who ranks Bradley who is indeed a good fighter above Wladimir has a very strange and very wrong opinion.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by KnockoutNed View Post
                The stuff of P4P legends:
                damn 1:30 in and only 1st round done.

                Absolutely disgraceful performance by Wladimir 'the octopus' Klitschko,

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by ***1048;ATAS View Post
                  Personally I don't include heavyweights in my pound 4 pound lists. I also don't include wrestlers in my boxing lists.
                  p4p means skill/resume ignoring size so if you explicitly disqualify an entire weight division it isn't a p4p list. It's just a list of your favorite little guys.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    I wouldnt have any heavyweights in a P4P list.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      140lb Tim was one of the best of recent times for that division. 147lb Tim is a media job.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP