I know p4p lists are subjective, and you should not take them to seriously. But seriously what is up with this?
You have Wladimir Klitscko, a ATG heavyweight, breaking records, knockibg people out, barely losing a round. Hes beaten Povetkin, Pulev, Tony Thompson, David Haye, bryant jennings, Chris Byrd, samual peter etc etc. Alot of them different style, alot of them undefeated when he fought them. He is one of the biggest title defence reigns ever, and one of the longest reigns ever in Heavyweight history. plus he has a 80 percent ko ratio.
Tim Bradley seems to be living off this "manny pacquio win" which if the lists are truely subjctive should take that with a pinch of salt. He debatably beats ruslan whos a great fighter, but liimited in skills, debatably beats Marquez, losses to manny pacquio, and then draws a fight.
How does that equate to being higher than Wladimir Klitscko on p4p rankings???? Does anyone truely think that Tim bradley will go down in history as better than Wlad??
You have Wladimir Klitscko, a ATG heavyweight, breaking records, knockibg people out, barely losing a round. Hes beaten Povetkin, Pulev, Tony Thompson, David Haye, bryant jennings, Chris Byrd, samual peter etc etc. Alot of them different style, alot of them undefeated when he fought them. He is one of the biggest title defence reigns ever, and one of the longest reigns ever in Heavyweight history. plus he has a 80 percent ko ratio.
Tim Bradley seems to be living off this "manny pacquio win" which if the lists are truely subjctive should take that with a pinch of salt. He debatably beats ruslan whos a great fighter, but liimited in skills, debatably beats Marquez, losses to manny pacquio, and then draws a fight.
How does that equate to being higher than Wladimir Klitscko on p4p rankings???? Does anyone truely think that Tim bradley will go down in history as better than Wlad??
Comment