WBC Votes Maskaev as Rahman's Next Foe

[!!Captain]

How's about we talk about what a hypocrite is?

It would be fun to gaurentee that space in your sig for another few years.

It'll be there as long as you continue to display the same level of ******ity and racism.

[the_truth_1984]

I scored the fight on paper and had Rahman winning the fight clearly.

[BloodClot]

Who didnt have Rahman winning except for those corruptjudges?

[the_truth_1984]

I'd rather see the Maskeave rematch than the Toney rematch.This will allow Rock to get his revenge over the hard punching Oleg and probably will more exciting than a Toney rematch.

[!!Captain]

I'd rather see the Maskeave rematch than the Toney rematch.This will allow Rock to get his revenge over the hard punching Oleg and probably will more exciting than a Toney rematch.

Sorry but after the last fight I don't think Toney's fights will be exciting anymore. If he couldn't manage his weight for the WBC championship fight, he won't do it for the rematch either.

[Leo Pradun]

Toney should take a fight in the mean time, as he gets to face the winner of this fight.

he better otherwise hes gonna come in weighing 320 lbs vs rhaman/maskaev winner...

[mECHsLAVE]

Bozo is clearly biased towards Toney.

That's the only way you can justify him getting a shot at a title and coming in that out of shape and performing that poorly, and then justifying his getting a rematch. Nobody had him winning. Everyone had Rahman winning. A draw is even ridiculous. Toney just did not win 6 rounds. Period. So a rematch, to me, is ******.

Now when I say this, all Bozo can talk about is Maskaev. Which has what to do with how poorly Toney performed and whehter he deserves a rematch- I'm not sure exactly. hehe. Maskaev has fought his way up the WBC rankings to get into an eliminator situation. He won. He holds a brutal KO over Rahman. So comparing Maskaev's title shot to Toney's is completely insane. Toney hasn't beaten anyone of note as a HW except a busted Holyfield 3 years ago.

Just curious...

Was Bozo calling for an immediate rematch of Byrd-Golota? Just like Toney-Rahman, that fight was for a title, the challenger had not earned the shot, and it was scored a draw. Yet, almost everyone had Golota winning. There was never a rematch. Surely you must have cried out for that rematch, right Bozo? Since you are so hot for Toney to get a rematch off of a title shot draw where 99% of everyone who saw the fight thought he *lost*. Right? Right??????

[.::EnRiQuE::.]

wat does Maskaev offer....N*gga is like 80 years old

[Leo Pradun]

bozo maskaev fought an eliminator fight to get the title shot, what did toney do to get it, how bout Lyhovich whos getting a shot at brewster or beck getting shot at valuev and Kings is trying to push ray austin as the mandatory for byrd-klitschko winner, what did those guys do to deserve title shots????

[Leo Pradun]

well, firstly, i believe upon winning the belt(or in rahman's case a sparring match with barrett) that you are allowed an optional title defence - the toney/rahman fight. next, maskaev is a mandatory and by the rule books does have the right to fight rahman next. that i don't mind very much.


thing i don't like - the wbc issuing a rematch with toney as mandatory after the maskaev/rahman fight. hasim should be entitled to more options in IMO. that's, if he does win that fight.

i think the wbo and ibf belts have the best chances of being unified in the near future. maybe, the wba might also be included in that mix.

agreed, i never heard of 3 mandatories in a row...