Why all the crapping on Kirkland? he has been a top 10 JMW for years and has at least three quality wins on his resume.
When is the last time Mayweather or Pacquiao fought a Kirkland-level opponent?
Collapse
-
You have Kirkland way underrated conveniently. You are really trying to sh&t on Canelo's great performance. Kirkland had only lost once and he had a good enough chin to get off the canvas and take lots of Angulo bombs and still win. Kirkland has the highest KO percentage of all the 154 pounders I know of. Canelo wanted to KO Cotto but Cotto backed out. If Cotto fights Canelo he will meet the same end as Kirkland and then you can try to turn his Cotto win into a poor win too. Of course I don't know Canelo will beat Cotto but I am sure he will. Cotto can't take that combination of speed, power and accuracy.Comment
-
You have Kirkland way underrated conveniently. You are really trying to sh&t on Canelo's great performance. Kirkland had only lost once and he had a good enough chin to get off the canvas and take lots of Angulo bombs and still win. Kirkland has the highest KO percentage of all the 154 pounders I know of. Canelo wanted to KO Cotto but Cotto backed out. If Cotto fights Canelo he will meet the same end as Kirkland and then you can try to turn his Cotto win into a poor win too. Of course I don't know Canelo will beat Cotto but I am sure he will. Cotto can't take that combination of speed, power and accuracy.Comment
-
Kirkland under Wolfe (perhaps the one that just beat Angulo) is a formidable guy, not the one Canelo fought admirable as he tried.Comment
-
Anyhow, personally I don't read too much into Canelo's win, it's just another good win at JMW to add to a growing resume.Comment
-
Comment
Comment