Why are people crying over Froch losing WBA's bogus title?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: WBA on The Andre Ward vs. Carl Froch Situation
Collapse
-
-
As if having two champions at the same weight wasn't ridiculous enough the WBA now strip Froch for inactivity whilst allowing Ward to do whatever he wants. How do these guys make this shit up?
Comment
-
-
For Froch, the pressure of not having to face a mandatory, and going for a big money fight is a plus. Its not as if he needs a belt to pack a stadium and get on PPV.
no-one with a pulse will fight Ward unless he has a belt, although i still think Froch is tempted to give it another shot if the finances are right.
Comment
-
-
-
The situation is that Froch wants big money and Ward wants a tune up, so wtf are we even talking about?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View Post??
Froch is stripped despite fighting more recently, yet Ward gets a special permit and holds onto his title.
I don't really get the WBA's logic on this. The funny thing is, Ward's fight isn't even at 168lbs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lefthook2daliva View PostThe situation is that Froch wants big money and Ward wants a tune up, so wtf are we even talking about?
Originally posted by robbyheartbaby View PostSo Froch defended his WBA regular belt in May of last year against Groves and gets stripped for inactivity and Ward hasn't fought since 2013 when he made an optional defence against someone I can't even remember and they strip Froch?! F*** YOU WBA!
Comment
Comment