Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBA on The Andre Ward vs. Carl Froch Situation

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Why are people crying over Froch losing WBA's bogus title?

    Comment


    • #12
      As if having two champions at the same weight wasn't ridiculous enough the WBA now strip Froch for inactivity whilst allowing Ward to do whatever he wants. How do these guys make this shit up?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
        Felix Sturm might become a potential big money opponent for Ward down the line, if he beats Chudinov.
        no no no no...please no.
        sturm puts me to sleep.

        Comment


        • #14
          Where does it say Froch has been stripped ?

          Comment


          • #15
            For Froch, the pressure of not having to face a mandatory, and going for a big money fight is a plus. Its not as if he needs a belt to pack a stadium and get on PPV.
            no-one with a pulse will fight Ward unless he has a belt, although i still think Froch is tempted to give it another shot if the finances are right.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Post
              Why are people crying over Froch losing WBA's bogus title?
              For my part, I don't care about the title, just the WBA's lack of consistency. They stripped Froch for lack of defenses but allowed Ward to keep his, it makes no sense.

              Comment


              • #17
                That doesn't make any sense, but whatever. The Cobra doesn't care.

                Comment


                • #18
                  The situation is that Froch wants big money and Ward wants a tune up, so wtf are we even talking about?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Weebler I View Post
                    ??

                    Froch is stripped despite fighting more recently, yet Ward gets a special permit and holds onto his title.

                    I don't really get the WBA's logic on this. The funny thing is, Ward's fight isn't even at 168lbs.
                    Froch would definitely hang them up... There is no way that he would fight Ward in Oakland for peanuts...

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by lefthook2daliva View Post
                      The situation is that Froch wants big money and Ward wants a tune up, so wtf are we even talking about?
                      This:

                      Originally posted by robbyheartbaby View Post
                      So Froch defended his WBA regular belt in May of last year against Groves and gets stripped for inactivity and Ward hasn't fought since 2013 when he made an optional defence against someone I can't even remember and they strip Froch?! F*** YOU WBA!
                      It makes no damn sense at all.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP