See here is my problem. I get it, Floyd has had a great career and I would certainly put him in the mix as one of the greats. Why do you feel the need to **** on other fighters careers especially when you omit relevant information?
Yes Ali lost to Spinks when he was a completely washed up fighter but he won a rematch with Spinks, even washed up.
Yes SRR was getting clowned late in his career but you do know he was 130-1 at one point in his career with his only loss coming to Jake Lomatta, an ATG and he beat Lamotta 4 or 5 times as well. Let me know how well Floyd would be doing if he fought 134 times during his prime. Also ask yourself why SRR had to fight well past his prime.
Sugar Ray lost to Terry Norris at 154 after spending several years campaigning at 160/168 and on top of that Terrible Terry Norris was a young hungry killer at the time. Dont even bring up Camacho as that is just dumb, SRL had'nt fought in 6 years, so just stop.
Yes Ali lost to Spinks when he was a completely washed up fighter but he won a rematch with Spinks, even washed up.
Yes SRR was getting clowned late in his career but you do know he was 130-1 at one point in his career with his only loss coming to Jake Lomatta, an ATG and he beat Lamotta 4 or 5 times as well. Let me know how well Floyd would be doing if he fought 134 times during his prime. Also ask yourself why SRR had to fight well past his prime.
Sugar Ray lost to Terry Norris at 154 after spending several years campaigning at 160/168 and on top of that Terrible Terry Norris was a young hungry killer at the time. Dont even bring up Camacho as that is just dumb, SRL had'nt fought in 6 years, so just stop.
Comment