FAO: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Supporters

[Left Hook Tua]

Interesting fact; According to The Ring Magazine, Floyd has beaten 9 fighters ranked #1 in the division being fought in (Hernandez, Corrales, Castillo x2, Gatti, Baldomir, Mosley, Canelo, Cotto) Manny Pacquaio will be his 10th, if he wins.

damn. impressive for floyd.

too bad we can't use ring rankings for standard reference anymore.

[Left Hook Tua]

The rankings matter little to me without context. You went by rankings, remember? Except when it doesn't suit you

Anyway, handing someone their second straight decisive loss is not that impressive. Decent win, nothing more.

that's why i'm gonna go off yours.

list your top 10 130 rankings 2006.

thank you.

[IMDAZED]

that's why i'm gonna go off yours.

list your top 10 130 rankings 2006.

thank you.

Still hanging on someone else's opinion to formulate your own?

Here let me help you then: like the Ring, I agree Mayweather is higher all-time.

You're welcome

[Left Hook Tua]

Still hanging on someone else's opinion to formulate your own?

Here let me help you then: like the Ring, I agree Mayweather is higher all-time.

You're welcome

so what should i refer to morales at 130 in 2006?

since he's obviously not 2.

#1? over barrera who beat him?

do i put pac #2, morales #3? even though morales just beat him?

#4? #5? put mosquera and barrios higher than morales?


"IM SO CONFOOS" -Manny Pacquiao

[bigjavi973]

you still haven't given me your 130 rankings 2006.

i'm gonna go off your rankings remember?

what rank should i refer to morales as in 2006?

since he wasn't 2.

he WAS number 2:

Junior Lightweights
Title Vacant
1.Marco Antonio Barrera
2.Erik Morales
3.Manny Pacquiao
4.Vicente Mosquera
5.Yodsanan Sor Nanthachai
6.Jorge Rodrigo Barrios
7.Carlos Alberto Hernandez
8.Alex Arthur
9.Robbie Peden
10.Janos Nagy

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2005

[IMDAZED]

so what should i refer to morales at 130 in 2006?

since he's obviously not 2.

#1? over barrera who beat him?

do i put pac #2, morales #3? even though morales just beat him?

#4? #5? put mosquera and barrios higher than morales?


"IM SO CONFOOS" -Manny Pacquiao

You've already told me that you want to use my rankings. I've cut through the loose tape for you since we know what this thread is really about. Floyd is higher on my all-time list than Manny is. And on the Ring's list too. Oh, and on irondan's too. No need to be confused, we're all here to help you get your feeble mind right.

[Left Hook Tua]

he WAS number 2:

Junior Lightweights
Title Vacant
1.Marco Antonio Barrera
2.Erik Morales
3.Manny Pacquiao
4.Vicente Mosquera
5.Yodsanan Sor Nanthachai
6.Jorge Rodrigo Barrios
7.Carlos Alberto Hernandez
8.Alex Arthur
9.Robbie Peden
10.Janos Nagy

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2005

thanks.


wait.... you trying to trick me, funny guy you.

ring magazine rankings don't count.

[IronDanHamza]

damn. impressive for floyd.

too bad we can't use ring rankings for standard reference anymore.

It is impressive for someone who apparently doesn't fight anyone no one in modern history can say they did that. Only fighter who comes close to fighting as many Top 5 ranked fighters (ring magazine) in the divison being fought at in the past 20 years is Pacquaio.

As for Ring, I've been using them as the go-to rankings since, since always really.

Back in the good old days, 60's/70's The Ring Magazine was often the only way of finding out who won fights, Aswell as the Newspaper. We didn't have the luxury of having every single fight on TV or if not an illegal Internet stream

[IMDAZED]

It is impressive for someone who apparently doesn't fight anyone no one in modern history can say they did that. Only fighter who comes close to fighting as many Top 5 ranked fighters (ring magazine) in the divison being fought at in the past 20 years is Pacquaio.

As for Ring, I've been using them as the go-to rankings since, since always really.

Back in the good old days, 60's/70's The Ring Magazine was often the only way of finding out who won fights, Aswell as the Newspaper. We didn't have the luxury of having every single fight on TV or if not an illegal Internet stream

I'm partial to Ring rankings as well. Probably since I grew up with them.

That said, it's always good to keep things in context. I remember when they had Pea #1 for far too long. Made Oscar #1 for no real good reason. And so forth and so forth. So while it's good to look back and read, Lord knows I always remember to use my own head too.

[IronDanHamza]

You've already told me that you want to use my rankings. I've cut through the loose tape for you since we know what this thread is really about. Floyd is higher on my all-time list than Manny is. And on the Ring's list too. Oh, and on irondan's too. No need to be confused, we're all here to help you get your feeble mind right.

I have Floyd higher at the moment.

But whoever wins this Saturday will be ranked higher than the other, in my opinion.