Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Really Strange, No Mayweather Rematch Clause

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Roach eating up these last few days of fame. After next Saturday he's gonna have to pay people to talk to him.

    Comment


    • #32
      If manny wins he should tell floyd to wait six years if he wants a rematch.. now thats the ultimate payback

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by slindee3 View Post
        You must be basing Pac's chances on his performances prior to Bradley. He dominated top level fighters prior to Bradley because he was on Peds. He got off the Peds and barely beat Bradley and lost to Marquez. He then dominated B+ fighters in Algeiri and Rios and all of his fans are under the illusion that he's back.

        Floyd is no B+ fighter and it's clear that if Pac's not roided up, he don't dominate elite fighter, much less beat them. Unless Pac gets in a lucky punch, there's no way he's winning this fight.
        Bradley > Canelo
        Algieri > Guerrero
        Rios and Maidana are pretty much on the same level.

        Pac's level of opposition is tougher.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by slindee3 View Post
          You must be basing Pac's chances on his performances prior to Bradley. He dominated top level fighters prior to Bradley because he was on Peds. He got off the Peds and barely beat Bradley and lost to Marquez. He then dominated B+ fighters in Algeiri and Rios and all of his fans are under the illusion that he's back.

          Floyd is no B+ fighter and it's clear that if Pac's not roided up, he don't dominate elite fighter, much less beat them. Unless Pac gets in a lucky punch, there's no way he's winning this fight.
          B+? Theres not one sane knowledgeable boxing fan who would consider Rios or Algerie a B fighter let alone a B+.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by T.M.T View Post
            hey roach. its called preparing for retirement. after mayweather beats pacquiao. then he's going after the WBC 160lb belt. then retire. there's no need for a pacquiao rematch clause
            Mayweather vs GGG? because by then thats who will have the WBC 160 belt

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
              Because Floyd knows its not going to warrant a rematch when he wins in dominating fashion .

              This is not going to be close .
              And he had doubts against Guerrero and Maidana ????

              Comment


              • #37
                Wait, isn't his name 'Money Mayweather' for a reason? A rematch would bring another $200 million, no? Is he going to change his name if Pacman knocks him out? Foreman thinks he's going to disappear if he loses...

                Comment


                • #38
                  Foreman could of had a greater legacy if it wasnt for him disappearing for years at a time after a loss. And you know that floyd cherish his record thats the first thing he will always bring up as a scale "well im undefeated and Ali isnt so im the greatest blah blah blah"

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I think there isn't rematch clause because:
                    A: The negotiations between Arum and Haymon/May and between HBO and Showtime were uncomfortable and hard enough first timeto them to not stick to a rematch clause.
                    B: Mayweather now is only fighting for set or break that record, the record is only work if he stays undefeated now and on his next 1 (set) or two (break) fights, if he loses to Pacquiao his record is done he won't have any motivation no more and he will retire in the ring or few days after the fight.
                    But I share the opinion that there will be no need for a rematch, I think Mayweather will win 116-112 with Pacquiao steal some early rounds with his speed and awkwardness but after that Mayweather adapts and defeat him. So I don't think that it will be particularly close or controversial. In fact I think that it won't be as close as the first Mayweather-Maidana, not because Maidana would be a better fighter than Pac, simply because the styles.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by elishua F View Post
                      Bradley > Canelo
                      Algieri > Guerrero
                      Rios and Maidana are pretty much on the same level.

                      Pac's level of opposition is tougher.
                      This is what an idiot looks like ladies & gentleman.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP