i for one will be happy to see froch go he calls himself supermiddleweight champion of the world when he was decisively beaten by soggy at 168 he's a paper champ a fraud who has been feasting on rematches with pasty faced northern europeans for years. what was froch's best win he did not have a "best win"
This is the second time you've posted that, not subtle.
No, it's just pure speculation without tangible proof.
Check the rankings. Even after being KO'd twice by Froch, Groves is way higher than Rodriguez in all of them except the WBO who haven't ranked him at all. Presumably because he is No 1 and mandatory with the WBC.
i for one will be happy to see froch go he calls himself supermiddleweight champion of the world when he was decisively beaten by soggy at 168 he's a paper champ a fraud who has been feasting on rematches with pasty faced northern europeans for years. what was froch's best win he did not have a "best win"
i for one will be happy to see froch go he calls himself supermiddleweight champion of the world when he was decisively beaten by soggy at 168 he's a paper champ a fraud who has been feasting on rematches with pasty faced northern europeans for years. what was froch's best win he did not have a "best win"
That's why it says... if you're a boxing champion being neither black or latino it means you're nothing but another ***ish fucking hypejob fake (c) boxing postulate
And the bogus paper champions like Froch, Ricky Burns, Scott Quigg, Carl Frampton etc. is the reason why the shit works perfectly.
Comment