Originally posted by AllBoxingAD
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is there a double standard for Kovalev and Stevenson?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postyou know who's the next cash cow possibly?
terence crawford. big time backing from top rank and hbo.
got skills AND entertaining.
they'll build him up then make him a star with a pac fight.
remember they were talking about pac is going to 140 if no floyd?
terence is set to win a 140 belt.
i can see a pac fight next year or so.
beat an old pac. you got your next big name.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MDPopescu View PostIt would have been easy for Haymon to replicate the Floyd-Pac formula (PPV on both Show and HBO)... He didn't want this. Why?... Can't they hype it and sell it big enough at venues such as Bell Centre or Pepsi in Quebec?...
You realize the difference in magnitude between Kov-Stevenson and Pac-Floyd?
You are being completely unrealistic, to say the least.
But like I said when all else fails blame Haymon.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostI don't think they did. GYM asked for the quick pursebid thereby outmanouvering Main Events.
Why WBC would want a pursebid so early when interim fights have already been scheduled is beyond me. I don't know if there's a precedent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostI dont get it.
All those posters who lamely defended Stevensons duck of Kovalev by saying it was a binnisdecision, is now attacking Kovalev for making a binnisdecision.
Why are they not defending him in the same obnoxious manner?
Why the double standard?
Comment
-
-
Clearly business decision on both sides. It's so so rare that a fighter "ducks" another. But there are so many kids on here that it's easy to see why those who defended Stevenson are now turning the tables -- they were greatly outnumbered before so of course they're gonna rub it in faces.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BattlingNelson View PostI dont get it.
All those posters who lamely defended Stevensons duck of Kovalev by saying it was a binnisdecision, is now attacking Kovalev for making a binnisdecision.
Why are they not defending him in the same obnoxious manner?
Why the double standard?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deevel916 View PostIf Stevensons duck was a "business decision" then it was a very poor one. Ever since ducking Kov, his stock has dropped immensely. He's been making less money to fight lesser competition.
Comment
Comment