Cotto and Canelo negotiating for September

[BTL]

Any video of Cotto saying that?

Oh no thats right we can believe Mr yesterday I was lying today Im telling the truth

Bro when it comes to Cotto it sounds very believable.

[El Campesino]

That poor little blowfish Cotto has to choose how he wants to die. At the jaws of a bull shark in Canelo or a great white shark in GGG, .

[Bardock]

here is what the idiots on this site just dont understand.

Cotto didn't fight in december against ANYBODY because he didn't have enough time to train with freddy roach. Then ODH & Canelo felt that they were going to compete with Floyd with that Cinco De Mayo ppv weekend by using Cotto as their little bargaining chip lets say. Cotto, not being the idiot that some other boxers are by letting themselves get used by a promoter (such as arum), gave the middle finger to BOTH Canelo & ODH. Do you guys honestly think that Cotto cares about Cinco De Mayo weekend? If he was going to fight at that time, why would he "compete" with Floyd as ODH has stated that they'll only move the date of the Cotto-Canelo fight if Floyd fights Pacquiao.... Ok UNDERSTAND. If Floyd fights pacquiao... And if Floyd didn't? Again, do you honestly think that Cotto cares about cinco de mayo weekend or to "compete" in a head to head ppv with floyd, where that situation would NOT maximize his earnings? Canelo got mad cuz he didn't get what he wanted, signed up kirkland and now is fighting kirkland at minute maid f^cking park.

KEY PARTS!!!--- Cotto doesnt care about cinco de mayo weekend. If he fought that weekend, it would be against floyd to try and take that 0. ODH & Canelo only would move the date if floyd-pac happened and if it didn't happen they would "compete" with floyd-??? in a head to head PPV. That WOULD NOT maximize EITHER of their money. Its a ****** business move, that ODH might do.

Bro this argument is a farce. COTTO'S ADVISER said the fight would be pushed back Why do you guys have selective memory? Should I go find the articles for you? I know you saw them.

[Beater_of_ass]

with cotto its not just about money lol... do u know his track record of demands?.... i wouldnt be suprised if he demands to have green only M&Ms in his dressing room.

Cotto is the diva and Canelo, the challanger wouldn't go to NY to take the MW title and didn't fight for another title at JMW because he didn't want to lose the extra pound. And Cotto is the diva...

What demands are you talking about? Coming to the ring last, name first? Because he didn't get that in the Sergio fight, so again what demands are you yet ANOTHER person who believes in fairy tales?

[Left Hook Tua]

nothing wbc or any orgs do would shock me.

they're slimier than the promoters.

remember marg-pac for 154 wbc belt?

[Beater_of_ass]

From the WBC website, posted Feb 26th, 2015...

http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/news/4224-cotto-must-face-golovkin

"Mauricio Sulaiman, World Boxing Council President, confirms that Miguel Cotto must face Gennady Golovkin in an obligatory defence.

Kazakh “GGG” defeated Britain's Martin Murray, last weekend, successfully defending his WBC interim middleweight championship. Cotto is the absolute Champion of the division, while Genaddy is the official challenger.

However, the Champion has a voluntary defence. If he wins he must fight Golovkin.

“ Miguel Cotto will have a voluntary defense. He will choose his rival. But the winner will have to face Golovkin” Mauricio stressed.

Possible opponents for Cotto are Timothy Bradley and Erislandy Lara. The fight Is scheduled for June at a venue to be determined."

They won't strip Cotto and if they do, they'll just make the title vacant and give it to the winner of Cotto/Canelo anyway, at which point they'll get another voluntary defense.

[Beercules]

How's that going to work when Floyd will have to fight Pacquiao in China?

[SilverMiles]

Seems odd that they would be negotiating with possibly dangerous upcoming fights. I mean if Cotto fight Heiland it's very possible he will lose and Canelo has a lot on his plate with the Kirkland fight.

[Barcham]

They won't strip Cotto and if they do, they'll just make the title vacant and give it to the winner of Cotto/Canelo anyway, at which point they'll get another voluntary defense.

So they will totally ignore all the press they have given to GGG over the past year. They will ignore their own interim title holder who automatically will be promoted to Champion when Cotto vacates his title and in effect strip him of the title as well to put it up for grabs between Cotto and Canelo? Who do you think is running the WBC? Al Haymon?

Cotto accepts his mandatory or he gets stripped. Everyone around here is always saying that the titles don't mean anything so why are you so insistent that he will get special treatment? It's not like he has been out there promoting the title or the WBC or anything. He has been sitting on his ass while GGG is out there promoting the WBC via the interim title. Cotto is a paper champion is every sense of the term.

[bigjavi973]

Bro this argument is a farce. COTTO'S ADVISER said the fight would be pushed back Why do you guys have selective memory? Should I go find the articles for you? I know you saw them.

So you think that Cotto would compete head to head with floyd in ppvs? Since you said that argument is a farce.