How do you, score fights?

[PeasantCrusha]

Fucking hilarious

[IMG]http://i1130.***********.com/albums/m538/EbayBuyer101/NELOfan_zpsdkqljnet.jpg[/IMG]

[Aztekkas]

[IMG]http://i1130.***********.com/albums/m538/EbayBuyer101/NELOfan_zpsdkqljnet.jpg[/IMG]

Hey... how do you know our official Canelotard uniform..? I can't wait for May 2... err I mean 9th!

[PeasantCrusha]

Hey... how do you know our official Canelotard uniform..? I can't wait for May 2... err I mean 9th!

Haha, yeah bro, I have been doing some "homework.."

[Rath]

I pick my favourite fighter of the two and I give him the round.

a good example of this is if the round is too close to call and could go either way, give it to Floyd every time all the time.

if there are 12 rounds of this so called close rounds, then Floyd wins it via 12 - 0 shut out.

generally termed by the Floyd fans as a.ss whooping or schooling

[Rath]

close my eyes, increase the volume and listen to commentators **** **** **** and Pow Pow Pow.

**** for Pac and Pow for opponent.

Count how many ****s and how many Pows are there tally it after 12 rounds.

if there are more ****s than pows then ****s win it.

[Easy Work.]

Lol how is that funny ? whoever lands cleaner shots and avoids being hit wins the rounds.

[El-blanco]

Lol how is that funny ? whoever lands cleaner shots and avoids being hit wins the rounds.

Avoiding shots doesn't win rounds. Ggg can get hit 100 times in a round and only land ten but you know his are more effective. You can't control a round slipping punches.

[AndrewSelby2016]

Clean effective punching is #1 by far. Ring generalship and aggression come into play if both guys are landing evenly.

[Scipio2009]

What do you personally base your scoring on? For me ring generalship, effective aggression, punches thrown and landed and also taken. What about you guys?

simple; whoever controls the pace/action of the round, wins the round. As a viewer, having the punch stats available simply confirms what my eyes are seeing.

as an example, the Alvarez-Lara fight, to me was a pretty easy fight to score; when Lara set his feet and dictated distance behind his straight shots, he won those moments. For the majority of the fight, however, Canelo kept the pressure on and his attack to the body seemed to immediately put Lara on his bike, allowing for Canelo to dictate the pace and flow of the fight. Think I had Canelo winning that fight 8-4.

As another example, you can look to the Oscar-Floyd fight; Most of the first four rounds were won by Oscar, mainly behind him setting the range of the fight behind his jab. Floyd found a way to compel Oscar to abandon the punch and, from then on, Floyd was able to control the action of the fight and setting a pace that allowed him to get his shots off clean while Oscar flailed/winged his own attempts; Floyd 8-3-1.

[Scipio2009]

Hector Camacho lands 26 pitty-pat shots, Edwin Rosario lands 12 solid shots that rock Camacho each time while drawing blood. Who do you give the round to?

depends on what the fight looks like; if Camacho landed those pitty pat punches in an attempt to simply keep Rosario off of him, Rosario would seem to be the fighter setting the pace, doing the damage, winning the round. If Camacho landed those shots behind punches that he was using to set range (double-jab, straight right, spin to reset for another shot, etc), but Rosario was able to wing in big shots (fight not being in his range/at his pace), Camacho dictating things from long range wins the round.