Comments Thread For: Miguel Cotto Reportedly Has Heiland on Hold if No K9

[Beater_of_ass]

you have reading issues.

re-read my posts. t i

It's not my reading, it's your inability to tell whatever point your trying to make coherent. Your response validates that because your rebuttal was "This is why I troll..." My conclusion is you troll simply because you're incapable of a conversation based on facts and rely on emotional trolling.

[Mr.Fantastic]

you guys know what cherry picking is?

it's picking easier fights than available.

just because cotto is too small or not good doesn't mean he can't cherrypick.

not all cherrypicks are won or easy.

some backfire especially guys like cotto who aren't as good as his matchmakers think.

actually yeah.

you want to feast on a scrub, fight more frequently.

pac had a cherrypicked algieri but he fought a good fight earlier that year.

golovkin hasn't been fighting elites so he makes up for it by fighting 4 times a year.

don't sit around for a year then fight a nobody.

listen.

i don't give a crap about org voluntary / mandatory.

but if javi is using voluntary as an EXCUSE then mandatory should matter to him too.

i don't care if cotto fights pac or floyd or canelo or ggg.

those are top fighters. not cherrypicks.

comprende? butt hurt mofo.

k9 and this heiland dude are not top fights. no need to defend it.

defend cotto for a good reason. not this ****** crap.

This guy gets it.

[Left Hook Tua]

You can troll any fighter you want and the fan base is not going to agree with you, especially if u are going to be one sided the entire time and avoid being rational. I don't mean to jump in on you guys debate but if you are admitting to being a troll then u r not even trying to be considerate during the debate.

this topic isn't a debate.

k9 and heiland are not good fights.

talking about cottos past or what he's earned or whatever bs doesn't change that fact.

[Left Hook Tua]

It's not my reading, it's your inability to tell whatever point your trying to make coherent. Your response validates that because your rebuttal was "This is why I troll..." My conclusion is you troll simply because you're incapable of a conversation based on facts and rely on emotional trolling.

i make my points, you're confused.

you try to say it's not cherrypicking because we say cotto sucks. wtf?

i'm talking to javi about if voluntary defense matter so does mandatory defense. then you jump in with but what if it's canelo/floyd huh?

and you think ppl are salty because if sergio. i don't even like sergio. he did same bs cotto trying to do.

[Left Hook Tua]

Heiland leading into Canelo will be a good year for him. Next year he's going to have to fight GGG.

this cotto fan knows wtf he's talking about.

heiland is just a tuneup to a bigger fight.

all that needs to be said. and totally fine if that's what happens.

[spytactics]

Cotto doesnt need any tune up the same way floyd didnt need to fight jmm, maidana twice, guerrero, ortiz, and midget hatton. 6 wasted fights for floyd and cotto is on the same path. Cotto should vacate mw or take on ggg. If he doesnt vacate he can fight lara(bad for cotto), canelo(good fight) or take on maidana(war)

[Beater_of_ass]

this cotto fan knows wtf he's talking about.

heiland is just a tuneup to a bigger fight.

all that needs to be said. and totally fine if that's what happens.

So what are you b*tching about then for things that haven't happened?

[Barcham]

So what are you b*tching about then for things that haven't happened?

That's what this thread is all about, complaining about a fight that has not even been confirmed yet. What if he ends up fighting someone else not even mentioned yet? Damn! Won't everyone feel ******?

[PeasantCrusha]

When a hater is on auto-pilot, all he does is hate on EVERY victory, rumored opponent, and anything else he can spew his internal rage upon.


It's therapy for malcontents and feminine men. They latch on to an external target and convince themselves that their target of choice, is why they live miserable lives. Much in the same way that women have a need to hate a female co-worker.

Some of these dudes are like John Hinkley, just waiting outside 24/7 in the cold for a shot a John Lennon. Haters gon hate.


~ Dr. Pez BootMash

[BattlingNelson]

What is there to make an excuse from, he hasn't been staying inactive on purpose, nothing he has done has been malicious. He was going to fight in December I believe, possibly against Canelo but I think HBO didn't have the budget and I clearly remember saying something about his future in Janurary of this year. Well, he was waiting for Floyd and negotiating with Canelo at the same time, 2 VERY good options for him and they both fell through.

Mayweather went with Manny and Canelo... I'm not getting into it but he has a fight and Cotto just barely got his. During all this Cotto was talking to RocNation about business AFTER and OUTSIDE of boxing, other ways to make money. He's not out making a ****ing album like Oscar and Manny, he got $5 million as a bonus for his troubles during this time. GGG now has a dance partner and I know Cotto wants nothing to do with GGG, but he's stated it's an option and he's obviously going to use it as a final cash out fight if he ever does fight him.

So, he's at fault for the WBC giving him a voluntary which he's now taking. As stated his first two choices for that voluntary were the best fighter in the planet and Canelo, it's not like he pulled a Stevenson, Garcia or Quillin with picking the easiest option first, he just had a string of bad luck with timing. **** happens, just because he's slowed down some in his career after some losses I'm not going to give him **** for defending his title against a guy in his own division.

So it doesn't matter if that volontary is taken say 2-3-4 years from now?

Can't you see he's keeping the belt hostage? I cannot believe you endorse this. You can call yourself a Cotto-fan. Not a boxing-fan.