Is it true, a great bigman always beats a great little man?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxfan83
    The Coach
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 15843
    • 2,102
    • 732
    • 160,371

    #1

    Is it true, a great bigman always beats a great little man?

    The HBO crew has thrown this statement out a few times before and I have heard boxing fans say the same, but is this true? If 2 fighters equally talented, square off, will the physically bigger fighter win a majority of the time? Is size (height/length) that important in boxing? Has history always shown that?

    btw, I am talking strictly height & length not weight.
  • VatoMulatto
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2003
    • 8168
    • 289
    • 218
    • 104,445

    #2
    Generally speaking YES, but there will always be exceptions to the rule.

    Comment

    • TRTboy
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2012
      • 3377
      • 90
      • 4
      • 16,860

      #3
      Of course. If not then there wouldn't be any weight divisions. duh!!

      Comment

      • BOXEO _
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 14407
        • 597
        • 254
        • 33,750

        #4
        Styles make fights but yea i'd say it's true 90% of the time.

        Comment

        • SplitSecond
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 23151
          • 1,715
          • 1,187
          • 85,044

          #5
          leonard hearns, duran leonard, pacquiao mayweather

          Comment

          • TRTboy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2012
            • 3377
            • 90
            • 4
            • 16,860

            #6
            Wait, you're talking about height? Then you should change your title lol. taller doesn't mean bigger.

            Comment

            • Bermuda
              potential friend
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2011
              • 5108
              • 240
              • 13
              • 11,493

              #7
              I don't think it does. A great fighter should be able to overcome any slight physical disadvantages. At the end of the day it all comes down to who wants it more. Who is willing to dig deeper into their heart and their soul to get that win! They have to be willing to look their opponent in the eyes and let them know that it's their time! THEIR TIME TO SHINE! YEAHHHHH!!!!!!!!


              - Bermuda
              Last edited by Bermuda; 03-19-2015, 07:05 PM.

              Comment

              • jas
                Voice of Reason
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22539
                • 936
                • 914
                • 1,059,614

                #8
                Exceptions :

                Duran Leonard
                Pacquaio Oscar
                Greb Fulton
                Greb Brennan
                Greb Miske
                Dempsey Willard
                Walker Uzcudun
                Louis Baer
                Fitzsimmons Corbett
                Armstrong Garcia
                Duran Barkley
                Whitaker vs Vasquez
                Jones Ruiz
                Toney Holyfield
                Benn Barkley
                Spinks Holmes
                Chavez Taylor
                Sam Langford Harry Wills
                Sam Langford Sam McVea
                Sam Langford Bill Tate
                Sam Langford Jim Johnson
                Sam Langford Jim Flynn
                Sam Langford Joe Jeanette
                Cotto Sergio

                As you can see, there are a lot of cases where a prime little man beats an aging big man. Not many in history though where a great little man beats a great big man when both are prime.

                A great big man beats a great little man when all other variables are equal

                Comment

                • them_apples
                  Lord
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 10008
                  • 1,240
                  • 938
                  • 41,722

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Boxfan83
                  The HBO crew has thrown this statement out a few times before and I have heard boxing fans say the same, but is this true? If 2 fighters equally talented, square off, will the physically bigger fighter win a majority of the time? Is size (height/length) that important in boxing? Has history always shown that?

                  btw, I am talking strictly height & length not weight.
                  Duran vs Leonard 1.

                  so no it's not true.

                  Comment

                  • Luilun
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 12457
                    • 555
                    • 94
                    • 58,436

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Boxfan83
                    The HBO crew has thrown this statement out a few times before and I have heard boxing fans say the same, but is this true? If 2 fighters equally talented, square off, will the physically bigger fighter win a majority of the time? Is size (height/length) that important in boxing? Has history always shown that?

                    btw, I am talking strictly height & length not weight.
                    Mayweather Pacquiao Marquez and Rigo seem to prove that wrong

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP