Is it true, a great bigman always beats a great little man?

[SN!PER]

If a great little man in his prime beats a great big man in his prime, it means the big man wasn't really that great.

[GateKEEPER88]

Who cares.

Tell fraud to take the test.
all of a sudden ariza signs on and he wants a cutoff date?

Take the test asterisk boy

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2366781-manny-pacquiao-wants-5-million-drug-fine-in-potential-floyd-mayweather-fight

[Golden Boi 360]

all things being equal, yes

[GateKEEPER88]

Zab Judah Knockdown (Ruled a Slip) Floyd Duckweather Jr.: https://********/tIsMK33hZZ4

South paw doe

[-Kev-]

If the are equally great, but not equal in size, yeah the bigger guy may win 9 out of 10 times. That's why when the little great guy wins that 1 time, it's made a big deal.

[////]

Mayweather Pacquiao Marquez and Rigo seem to prove that wrong

How have they proved that wrong?

He's not asking about a small elite fighter beating up larger average fighters. He's talking about two fighters of equal talent and one is bigger.

You think Pacquaio would beat his own mirror image who is naturally 4 inches taller with 20 lbs of extra muscle? Why?

[pacmanis1]

all things being equal, yes

This ^^^. But two fighters are never really truly equal. I'd pick a bigger Pacquiao to beat a smaller Pacquiao.

[CANELOLUJAH]

prime for prime is almost always a yes.

[Ryannn]

yes, but the thing is there are a lot of factors that come into the fight aside from size. Style, ring age, etc.

Obviously if you cloned Pacquiao and added 6 inches and 30 pounds with all things being exactly the same, little pac will get beat by clone pac.