Come on man, please cut the nonsense. VADA doesn't have an internal staff for instance that collects samples. I bet you didn't know that. Their sample collecting gets outsourced to another company.
Again, there is technically no difference between the two organisations, as they both take samples and send them to the same exact UCLA lab for results. Yes, VADA charges less. But there is a reason for it. And you don't even know the key reason.
Why didn't Manny do VADA for Marquez 3 & 4 or Bradley 1 & 2? Manny had no problem using VADA for Rios and Algieri who were both making their welterweight debuts but not the better guys like Marquez and Bradley. The funniest part about the VADA situation is that Manny used VADA for Rios, then no VADA for Bradley 2, then used VADA for Algieri... that's highly su****ious. Why didn't Manny use the VADA testing for Bradley 2? Bradley did VADA for that fight along with NSAC testing but Manny used only NSAC testing. I guess that doesn't fit your agenda though does it...
Comment