Comments Thread For: Rigondeaux's Manager Petitions For Quigg Mandatory

[The Big Dunn]

Frampton has done everything right so far in his career. The Cazares fight was an eliminator for the WBC title. He was in position to fight Santa Cruz who turned down the fight then the Kiko situation came up.

He just fought his mandatory and now he's looking to make the biggest fight available to him. His career and life doesn't revolve around Guillermo Rigondeaux. Funnily enough, he makes decisions based on his own life and not Rigo or the 4 diehard nerds on this forum.

There's nothing wrong with anything Frampton has done in his career. All of his decisions have been the correct ones. He says that after Quigg, he'd like to face Rigondeaux. I don't see anything wrong with that.

I understand that Rigondeux diehards are like a bunch of frustrated ******* at the moment because of the Santa Cruz situation. They got teased and baited then switched. Now they're all angry and lashing out at everyone. I get it. It's still not Frampton's fault.

Dirk, its simple. You and others have spent a year claiming Frampton is the best in the division after Rigo. So we ask that they fight. You response-fight quigg 1st because that's where the money is.

But you need to acknowledge that is a regional affair that the rest of the world doesn't care about more than a rigo fight. The rest of the world would like either guy to fight rigo the same way we want LSC to.

LSC is choosing not to and is getting killed for it. SO when Frampton and Quigg exhibit the same behavior-even though the situations are not exactly the same-they are going to get killed for their actions as well.

You've been giving khan all this credit for "Wanting to fight the best" while he chases after a Floyd and Manny fight. so you should be the 1st one killing these two for doing everything to avoid facing rigo.

Try pretending they are Quiggenstein from the US and Frampez from Mexico instead of Northern Ireland and England. I bet then you'd understand everyone much easier.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Dirk, its simple. You and others have spent a year claiming Frampton is the best in the division after Rigo. So we ask that they fight. You response-fight quigg 1st because that's where the money is.

More of the Big Dunn's (in)famous misquoting and half-truths.

Actually what I've been saying for a year is almost 100% accurate with what has played out. I said Frampton would win his world title, then face his mandatory, then face Quigg in a huge summer fight and then face the ultimate challenge in Rigo.

I thought Santa Cruz might fit in somewhere but I didn't account for your boy turning into a complete b1tch so what can you do?

[bigjavi973]

You don't see the difference?

You're a f^cking idiot.

Again back to frampton, his team were the ones that said frampton is the best at 122 and they are gonna prove it IN A COUPLE OF YEARS!!!!!!! LMAO

That is a generalization... especially since its unquoted.

"He's the best super bantamweight in the world. That includes Leo Santa Cruz, Scott Quigg & Guillermo Rigondeaux. He's a sentional fighter and over the next couple of years, we intend to prove that."

You see the quotes there? Now click the link and see if I "changed" the wording around... except for the one that I already stated.

Don't get a headache thinking about it.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

You're a f^cking idiot.

Again back to frampton, his team were the ones that said frampton is the best at 122 and they are gonna prove it IN A COUPLE OF YEARS!!!!!!! LMAO

That is a generalization... especially since its unquoted.

"He's the best super bantamweight in the world. That includes Leo Santa Cruz, Scott Quigg & Guillermo Rigondeaux. He's a sentional fighter and over the next couple of years, we intend to prove that."

You see the quotes there? Now click the link and see if I "changed" the wording around... except for the one that I already stated.

Don't get a headache thinking about it.

Wow this guy really doesn't see the difference between what he wrote and the actual quote. Staggering. It's beyond belief.

Your wording is "In a couple of years" which is clearly NOT what they said. You've been too dumb to understand the quote and you've jumped to your own conclusions.

What do you think the quote means?

[jas]

I called it when WBA mandated froch to fight ward

I knew there would be calls for Quigg and Jacobs to fight the Real champions rigo and ggg

[bigjavi973]

He's not worthy of a shot at Frampton but he's worthy of a shot at Rigondeaux?

Seems legit

he hold a version of the wba title, one that frampton would be fighting for if they fight... thats why he's more "worthy" of a shot at rigondeaux. I also tried looking for scott quigg's name in the IBF rankings... can't find it.

http://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfusba_02APR2014/index.php/ratings/ibf-ratings?view=rankings

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I called it when WBA mandated froch to fight ward

I knew there would be calls for Quigg and Jacobs to fight the Real champions rigo and ggg

The only reason they mandated Froch and Ward is because those two haven't fought in over a year and the WBA weren't getting their sanctioning fees.

There's almost no chance they'll enforce Quigg vs Rigo.

[bigjavi973]

Wow this guy really doesn't see the difference between what he wrote and the actual quote. Staggering. It's beyond belief.

Your wording is "In a couple of years" which is clearly NOT what they said. You've been too dumb to understand the quote and you've jumped to your own conclusions.

What do you think the quote means?

Its obvious you don't know what generalization means.

Lets look at it:

"In a couple of years....."

"Over the next couple of years....."

You must take it as they were only referring to him being "a sensational fighter". Its actually in the same quoted paragraph. So over the next couple of years. They are going to prove that frampton is a sensational fighter and that he's the best superbantamweight in the world.

[removed]

People need to realise that nobody gives a **** about Rigo apart from a few losers on NSB.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Its obvious you don't know what generalization means.

Lets look at it:

"In a couple of years....."

"Over the next couple of years....."

You must take it as they were only referring to him being "a sensational fighter". Its actually in the same quoted paragraph. So over the next couple of years. They are going to prove that frampton is a sensational fighter and that he's the best superbantamweight in the world.

There's a distinct difference between saying "in a couple of years" and "over the next couple of years". Surely you get that?

What do you think is wrong with what they said?