Better win: Mayweather over Canelo or Pacquiao over Bradley(2)?

[smoothsmg]

Based off of a win ya'll claim he should not have gotten

They want it every which way. he didnt beat Manny the first fight, but since he got the gift victory, his status for p4p is legitimate. Bradley has rarely looked good in a fight. Head butt fest and clinches.

[thecomedian2]

Canelo by a country mile!!!!

Not too many active fighters in the 147-154 range would have had much of a chance of beating Canelo that night.

Not Marquez and Not Bradley thats for sure, Canelo would have walked them down, But Floyd Put on a Boxing Clinic and these fools cant see that?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

Floyd over canelo... Canelo was bigger, has some power..


Bradley is a tough out but he doesn't have threatening power, and the size was about the same...

Both are very good wins but I gotta go with canelo

[jas]

the difference is so clear ray charles could see it.

[thecomedian2]

the difference is so clear ray charles could see it.

Canelo is Larger than Hulk Marquez..! whats your point?.. Floyd beat a much larger fighter with Pop.. Pacquiao Beat a guy he had already defeated before that lacked any power at 147, whats your point?

[daggum]

bradley is meh an ok fighter but canelo invents his own divisions! the canelo division is the hottest division in boxing right now. in 100 years the canelo division will still be remembered and canelo's debatable decision wins will be played on loop on canelo day(replaces labor day)

[jas]

So now everything has to do with power

By this logic, Hopkins ****** throughout his career

Bradley has iron chin, good skills, above average hand speed and foot speed, versatility, will to win

[daggum]

why are people saying canelo has more power therefore it's a better win? power is just one aspect of boxing and canelo's not even a very big puncher. floyd can't punch either so if someone beats floyd are you going to say its not as good as beating a guy with more power?

[SplitSecond]

bradley would win more rounds against floyd than canelo, that's a given

bradley isn't easy to hit when in with orthodox fighters, the southpaw left was one big weakness of his going into the first fight and he ate hellacious shots, pacquiao is a bad style match-up not unlike the more mobile mayweather against a a flat-footed canelo looking to box, key here, canelo made little use of his extra weight, and weight is all he had as floyd is actually longer than him

pacquiao would have beaten that canelo, alot better than floyd, he would leave that fight alot more bruised and damaged

canelo fought floyd the same way he fought trout, his inexperience led him to believe he could casually box with everyone, he's never had a hard fight, bradley has been chewed up and spit out, the guy know's how to add his spirit to the mix and make it a much more gruelling fight for anyone he's against, canelo like against trout, a fight some people felt he lost but was only close because the guy coasts, like he did with floyd he thought he could beat anyone with intelligence and calmly boxing without putting much effort into it, well after the floyd loss reality has set in a bit, and he showed great improvement vs lara

if canelo had fought lara after he'd fought trout i'd put down money that he'd have tried to box with lara

[thecomedian2]

So now everything has to do with power

By this logic, Hopkins ****** throughout his career

Bradley has iron chin, good skills, above average hand speed and foot speed, versatility, will to win

Whats so hard to Understand? get it in your thick Pac.turd skull, Pacquiao was fighting a guy he had already defeated, he had already defeated Bradley, cant you understand that, very thing that came after the robbery was irrelevant