Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao vs Hearns

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
    Look at your poll man..just look at it....you asked a question..theres your answer
    So when there is a poll and Floyd has the short end of the stick, do you agree with a poll?

    "Poll says that Floyd is a cherry picker. There is my answer" - LarryXXX

    "Poll agrees that Floyd has been putting roadblocks since 2009 so that he doesn't fight Manny. There is my answer" - LarryXXX

    "Poll says Manny is ahead of Floyd as far as resume and top ATG. There is my answer" - LarryXXX





    .
    Last edited by ADP02; 02-17-2015, 02:20 AM.

    Comment


    • Hearns for me, probably by KO.

      Comment


      • Manny Pacquiao is a great fighter, that said, anyone without an agenda can clearly see there's no realistic way he wins this fight

        Comment


        • Originally posted by just the facts View Post
          Manny Pacquiao is a great fighter, that said, anyone without an agenda can clearly see there's no realistic way he wins this fight
          Hearns is pretty big.

          But Manny did beat Margarito pretty good.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
            Hearns is pretty big.

            But Manny did beat Margarito pretty good.
            Hearns isn't Margarito. The hitman decapitates Pacquiao within 5 rounds.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Since 1985 View Post
              Hearns isn't Margarito. The hitman decapitates Pacquiao within 5 rounds.
              I can see where you are coming from here but seriously there is also a good chance that Pacquiao could simply overwhelm him.

              If you seen a WW Pac up against a WW Hearns, Hearns is significantly less conditioned and really slender at that weight. He is pretty quick and his long range power is going to be a factor which might catch Pac out that's true but he isn't any faster than any of the fighters Pac has already dispatched, and not as skilled as many of them either. What he does have is a longer range (that can also be swarmed and tied up though in close) and power. But Pac has decimated many great boxers.

              It would be interesting that's all I can say. Obviously a bigger Hearns is different.

              Comment


              • I would say Hearns by KO. Pacquiao would be a sitting duck for the hitman in my opinion.

                Comment


                • Pacquiao has never hand problems with the jab.

                  His speed, footwork and power causes Hearns a lot of probelms.

                  Can't see Hearns tagging Pacquiao.

                  And remember the scenario for this fight.

                  The Pacquiao that faced Cotto vs The Hearns that faced Leonard in there first bout.

                  Hearns is so open to the left hook.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
                    Pacquiao has never hand problems with the jab.

                    His speed, footwork and power causes Hearns a lot of probelms.

                    Can't see Hearns tagging Pacquiao.

                    And remember the scenario for this fight.

                    The Pacquiao that faced Cotto vs The Hearns that faced Leonard in there first bout.

                    Hearns is so open to the left hook.
                    I didn't think it was possible but you just elevated your ******ity level. Pacquiao doesn't throw left hooks.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
                      Hearns is pretty big.

                      But Manny did beat Margarito pretty good.
                      Manny beat what Shane Mosely left of Margarito.

                      Hearns 6'2

                      Margarito 5'10

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP