The point is that it's ridiculous to describe any brand of 8 oz boxing gloves as "pillows." They can all be used to either knock out, hurt, or cut an opponent.
I'm not talking about differences and it's not in any way an excuse for a fighter losing.
Either way, no one even knows what brand od gloves Pacquiao is using yet some people are making statements about what type of gloves he agreed to with no knowledge of this whatsoever.
It's a cheap move of weakening the opponent.
Would it be fair if Nadal told Federer he can't use his preferred Wilson racket and demands he uses a Dunlop one instead?
As irrelevant as this whole debate about gloves in the Maidana fight is I must correct you. Maidana was never trying to wear Cleto Reyes gloves. They were Everlast MX gloves.
no sh^t sherlock... thats why I put Everlast mx/cleto reyes... cuz they are BOTH punchers gloves.
The gloves were not discussed in the article. Learn how to lie. Learn when to lie. When you do it as a desperate ploy to cover for a losing effort in a debate its quite obvious.
"the brand of gloves" where one of the list of things that were stated in the article.
The point is that it's ridiculous to describe any brand of 8 oz boxing gloves as "pillows." They can all be used to either knock out, hurt, or cut an opponent.
I'm not talking about differences and it's not in any way an excuse for a fighter losing.
Either way, no one even knows what brand od gloves Pacquiao is using yet some people are making statements about what type of gloves he agreed to with no knowledge of this whatsoever.
yup thats why my initial post said, "if" pacquiao doesnt get to wear his LEGAL cleto reyes. Im hoping he does, cuz they are LEGAL. i feel you tho
no sh^t sherlock... thats why I put Everlast mx/cleto reyes... cuz they are BOTH punchers gloves.
No you didn't. I quoted what you said. You are a complete liar. Why would you lie about that when the proof of what you actually said is in the quote..?
Tweet
"the brand of gloves" where one of the list of things that were stated in the article.
Comment