Comments Thread For: DeGale: I Think Froch Ducked Me, But I'm Moving On

[Public_Enemy]

It's pretty similar to the Stevenson/Froch situation.

[Bardock]

Unlike you and your moustached lover, I will actually call Froch out if he fights Hopkins.

You keep choking on Santa Cruz's greasy **** no matter how many janitors he fight.

Oh that's right, De Geale is your favorite fighter now. As soon as Froch showed his coward ways and was getting ready to vacate, you tried to save face by changing your avi from that pathetic, shameless AmereCon avi&sig, to this one.

Go suck on some tea and bow to the queen f4ggot.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Oh that's right, De Geale is your favorite fighter now. As soon as Froch showed his coward ways and was getting ready to vacate, you tried to save face by changing your avi from that pathetic, shameless AmereCon avi&sig, to this one.

Go suck on some tea and bow to the queen f4ggot.

It's been known for months that Froch wasn't going to fight DeGale. DeGale is my favourite fighter, has been for a while. How does that "save face"? Do you even know what "saving face" means?

Froch is a coward for fighting Hopkins? What does that make Santa Cruz for fighting road sweepers? Do you not realise how ****** you look?

Can't you just do everyone a favour and choke on a burrito or something? You are of no use to humanity.

[Wicky]

When Froch was looking for his first title he was doing exactly the same ***** as this to Calzaghe... claiming that Joe was ducking him. It's small-cocck ego buulli*****.

Calzaghe was looking for some BIG pay cash out fights (which he had earned), and Froch wasn't relevant enough. Same story now with DeGale. Froch has earned the right to make a couple of big paydays and DeGale is a nobody.

Froch should apologise to Joe though for all the BS, now that he's in the same position and doing the same thing to DeGale.

[ShoulderRoll]

When Froch was looking for his first title he was doing exactly the same ***** as this to Calzaghe... claiming that Joe was ducking him. It's small-cocck ego buulli*****.

Calzaghe was looking for some BIG pay cash out fights (which he had earned), and Froch wasn't relevant enough. Same story now with DeGale. Froch has earned the right to make a couple of big paydays and DeGale is a nobody.

Froch should apologise to Joe though for all the BS, now that he's in the same position and doing the same thing to DeGale.

Except that Froch did give a young, up and coming English boxer a chance when he fought Groves.

[Wicky]

Except that Froch did give a young, up and coming English boxer a chance when he fought Groves.

Groves was Froch's mandatory, he didn't "give" him anything.

[ShoulderRoll]

Groves was Froch's mandatory, he didn't "give" him anything.

Froch could have dropped the belt to chase a bigger money fight, like he's doing with DeGale. But instead he went ahead with the bout against the youngster Groves.

[Weebler I]

Groves was Froch's mandatory, he didn't "give" him anything.

He could've unified with Bika or Stieglitz at that time.

If he does fight in Nottingham next, and it's not DeGale I'd like to see him fight Anthony Dirrell and should he win, then the winner of DeGale-Dirrell towards the end of the year.

[Wicky]

Froch could have dropped the belt to chase a bigger money fight, like he's doing with DeGale. But instead he went ahead with the bout against the youngster Groves.

So, you're saying that because Froch didn't abdicate he "gave" his mandatory a shot? Don't be so ******** ******. You're not even making a point.

[Wicky]

He could've unified with Bika or Stieglitz at that time.

If he does fight in Nottingham next, and it's not DeGale I'd like to see him fight Anthony Dirrell and should he win, then the winner of DeGale-Dirrell towards the end of the year.

Maybe. He was quite vocal about not wanting the 1st Groves fight, saying that Groves wasn't up to it and didn't deserve a shot. One can only imagine that he had fewer options than you think.