Comments Thread For: Scott: Bryant Jennings is Going To Beat Wladimir Klitschko

[King_]

i think in the first round pulev was doing alright, and if my memory doesn't fail me pulev landed something on Wlad that got Wlad's attention then all of a sudden seconds later Wlad landed that hook and after that it was all Wlad....i just think if Jennings comes with a solid gameplan, and i've seen plenty good Philly fighters do so, he could put Wlad in a situation Wlad hasn't been in, whether behind on rounds or something uncomfortable for Wlad, i'm not even from Philly but i believe that if a fighter makes it out of Philly he's more than likely a real good fighter

Okay so cliffs.... Jennings from Philly so he's gotta be a good fighter.


Cool, gotcha. NOW REMEMBER this after Wlad kicks his ass and makes him look like a sad puppy-dog amateur who doesn't know what happened.


And I hope you give Wlad credit after all that for beating a "good fighter." You're one of those lame posters who DON'T and usually call the guy- Jennings in this case, a bum afterward.

[skinnystev]

for jennings to win he has to hit clutchko hard on the jaw with the left hand if he cant do that he may as well concede right now

[kafkod]

all of wlad's opponents i've seen recently are sorry azz stiffs, Jennings has that athleticism mostly seen in hispanic and black fighters, he has that grace in his movements and could win some rounds early and make it into an interesting fight.....then imagine on NBC WILDER VS JENNINGS for all the marbles in the heavyweight division......mayneeeee

Some of you guys over on the western side of the Atlantic never cease to amaze me with your ridiculous racial stereotypes.

Seems like every single ethnic group under the western sun can pull one out of the hat to suit their own agenda.

I thought the "athleticism" steotype was reserved for blacks. But let me guess, you yourself are Hispanic, yeah?

And the "sorry azz stiffs" you refer to are all going to be white, non-hispanic Europeans, correct?

[King_]

Some of you guys over on the western side of the Atlantic never cease to amaze me with your ridiculous racial stereotypes.

Seems like every single ethnic group under the western sun can pull one out of the hat to suit their own agenda.

I thought the "athleticism" steotype was reserved for blacks. But let me guess, you yourself are Hispanic, yeah?

And the "sorry azz stiffs" you refer to are all going to be white, non-hispanic Europeans, correct?

Wow. I just read that racist post.


Who even calls hispanics athletic? LMFAO.


But I won't say anything else then that. I'm better then that.

[Real Talk85]

Okay so cliffs.... Jennings from Philly so he's gotta be a good fighter.


Cool, gotcha. NOW REMEMBER this after Wlad kicks his ass and makes him look like a sad puppy-dog amateur who doesn't know what happened.


And I hope you give Wlad credit after all that for beating a "good fighter." You're one of those lame posters who DON'T and usually call the guy- Jennings in this case, a bum afterward.

Whats with all the venom? Are you not a boxing fan? Your comments suggest you have something personal against Jennings.

Why do you take offense to the idea that Jennings is the best fighter Wlad has face as of late? Take a look at this objectively, and tell us how you see this fight going instead of going into some weird personalized rants on Jennings.

Reality is that he is a good match for Wlad and beating him will attest to Wlads versitility. No one questioned if this fight would be one for his legacy we just acknowledge how good a fight it is going to be.

[King_]

Whats with all the venom? Are you not a boxing fan? Your comments suggest you have something personal against Jennings.

Why do you take offense to the idea that Jennings is the best fighter Wlad has face as of late? Take a look at this objectively, and tell us how you see this fight going instead of going into some weird personalized rants on Jennings.

Reality is that he is a good match for Wlad and beating him will attest to Wlads versitility. No one questioned if this fight would be one for his legacy we just acknowledge how good a fight it is going to be.

Wtf are you talking about? I like Jennings and said this would be a great fight before it even got made


You're talking to the wrong person.


All I was saying to that poster was he better give credit to Wlad after its over because he's saying right now that Jennings is good. I think Wlad will win, but that doesn't mean I said anything bad about Jennings. My post was based around that poster- who is clearly a racist based on his previous post in this thread (read it)


Jennings is NOT better then Pulev or Povetkin. Wlad has fought the #1 and #2 fighters in the division in the past year.... he's been fighting good fighters. But that's besides the point and has nothing to do with this. Like I said I wanted this fight before it even got announced, so Wlad can keep the ball rolling against good competition until the WBC champ/Fury are ready to fight him.

[Stuntman Mike]

Whats with all the venom? Are you not a boxing fan? Your comments suggest you have something personal against Jennings.

Why do you take offense to the idea that Jennings is the best fighter Wlad has face as of late? Take a look at this objectively, and tell us how you see this fight going instead of going into some weird personalized rants on Jennings.

Reality is that he is a good match for Wlad and beating him will attest to Wlads versitility. No one questioned if this fight would be one for his legacy we just acknowledge how good a fight it is going to be.

Jennings is a tomato can that beat a better skilled and more powerful tomato can due to lack of discipline...

Jennings will get put away without even landing a jab on Wladimir and I'm supposed to be a so called Wladimir hater

How anyone can think this is a good fight or remotely interesting is beyond me


two things can happen
1. Wlad finally shows balls and goes out like he did against Eddie Chambers in the 12th round of their fight and get the KO in either the first or second round

or and most likely

2.Wlad will fight tentative and tire his man out with illegal tactics until he has nothing left and then finally start putting punches together for a late stoppage


One thing is for sure,Wlad will never be hurt in this fight,its what made the Haye and Povetkin fight intrigueing obviously before the bell sounded,because people thought they'd have the ability to hit Wlad(more so Haye) and he did but just with sloppy shots Wlad saw coming

This fight is a joke

[Real Talk85]

chill out and change your tampon, Lomachenko is no stiff for example, stop taking things to the heart it's just a boxing website softy

Pirog when he was healthy was no stiff, he fought like a combination of Floyd Mayweather and Roy Jones.

GGG is a Winky Wright doppelganger ( before you guys start your tantrums watch Winky's fights, he and GGG have the same high gaurd and throw their shots from the same places, and stay dead in front of their guy most the time).

I think that, the stiff style of fighting came from lack of exposure. Now you have trainers that teach a variety of different styles going all over the world and training fighters they may not have ever been exposed to ten-fifteen years ago.

[Real Talk85]

Wtf are you talking about? I like Jennings and said this would be a great fight before it even got made


You're talking to the wrong person.


All I was saying to that poster was he better give credit to Wlad after its over because he's saying right now that Jennings is good. I think Wlad will win, but that doesn't mean I said anything bad about Jennings. My post was based around that poster- who is clearly a racist based on his previous post in this thread (read it)


Jennings is NOT better then Pulev or Povetkin. Wlad has fought the #1 and #2 fighters in the division in the past year.... he's been fighting good fighters. But that's besides the point and has nothing to do with this. Like I said I wanted this fight before it even got announced, so Wlad can keep the ball rolling against good competition until the WBC champ/Fury are ready to fight him.

My bad, I thought you were just hating. Yeah I see this as a good fight as well, see my breakdown in my previous post. It's just that most people on this site just spit venom at anyone that is not their favorite fighter and no one really talks boxing or breaks down fights on here, it's just fanboy back and forth.

I would like to know what your break down of the fight is. What do you think they bring as far as strengths and weaknesses?

[St. Johns Gent]

Wtf are you talking about? I like Jennings and said this would be a great fight before it even got made


You're talking to the wrong person.


All I was saying to that poster was he better give credit to Wlad after its over because he's saying right now that Jennings is good. I think Wlad will win, but that doesn't mean I said anything bad about Jennings. My post was based around that poster- who is clearly a racist based on his previous post in this thread (read it)


Jennings is NOT better then Pulev or Povetkin. Wlad has fought the #1 and #2 fighters in the division in the past year.... he's been fighting good fighters. But that's besides the point and has nothing to do with this. Like I said I wanted this fight before it even got announced, so Wlad can keep the ball rolling against good competition until the WBC champ/Fury are ready to fight him.

is it true or false that Jennings' upper body movement and footwork is better than Wlad's previous opponents? What was so great, strictly in terms of athleticism, about Wlad's previous opponents? Is it not true that they stand in the middle of the ring with Wlad for most if not the whole round? Jennings doesn't stand in the middle of the ring the whole round and therefore a strategy that integrates his athleticism (footwork, head movement, etc.) could be benificial to Jennings