Comments Thread For: J. Mayweather: Floyd Don't Need Pacquiao For Legacy

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Would squash the ducking Pac remarks for most.

Fanboyism aside you honestly believe that ducking bs? Floyd had to practically force Manny to take his phone number in person.

Sit tight little one when it gets signed youll get your wish. Have fun watching a live beheading because thats what it will be.

[SterlingStained]

Fanboyism aside you honestly believe that ducking bs? Floyd had to practically force Manny to take his phone number in person.

Sit tight little one when it gets signed youll get your wish. Have fun watching a live beheading because thats what it will be.

you havent changed one bit burns and i love you for it.

beheading?

loooooooool when was the last time floyd "beheaded" anybody?

[TheWinners]

Jeff is clearly right. I don't understand why idiots say Mayweather's whole 17 years of dominating the sport will be tarnished because he didn't fight Manny. But they don't say it the other way around. Mayweather has the greater legacy. He's broke PPV records, statistical records, and he's at the top of the Forbes list. His legacy is stamped already rather he fights Manny or not. Fighting and beating Manny is the icing on the cake. But I don't think he needs this fight to define his career. That's just a ****** ass statement and opinion or whatever you want to call it.

[tokon]

personally i disagree with jeff mayweather. floyd's "legacy", whilst already - to some extent - being established, will always be questioned if he doesnt fight pacquaio.

it will also be so much greater if he does fight and beat him.

but there's always that risk that he fights him and loses; so what would that mean to his "legacy"?!

maybe this is what is in the back of all the mayweathers' minds??

also let's not forget that pro boxing is a business first and foremost and one thing that a fight with pac will bring is something that "money" mayweather thrives on; more money than any other fight out there or on the horizon before his retirement!

plus the rematch money.

and the trilogy money if it goes 1-1 hahaha!

[SterlingStained]

Jeff is clearly right. I don't understand why idiots say Mayweather's whole 17 years of dominating the sport will be tarnished because he didn't fight Manny. But they don't say it the other way around. Mayweather has the greater legacy. He's broke PPV records, statistical records, and he's at the top of the Forbes list. His legacy is stamped already rather he fights Manny or not. Fighting and beating Manny is the icing on the cake. But I don't think he needs this fight to define his career. That's just a ****** ass statement and opinion or whatever you want to call it.

1. floyd mayweather has never beaten a bona fide hall of famer who was in their prime.

2. his best win is diego corrales.

those are facts.

at forbes lists and statistical records

[jas]

[MayMosPeaHop]

All the Mayweathers believe Manny does not have a shot. I do not either. What makes his statement wrong? When Manny's own trainer states they have to fight the perfect. Get real! Manny is taking a fat L. Stop kidding yourself.

[SterlingStained]

lmfaaaoo is that russian fsb or isis???

[lowblows420]

How can those coward fkng monkey jack a s s mayweathers talk bout floyd will whoop pacs a s s but also got a excuse ready for floyd to duck him. shut the fk up and sign for the fight you b i tc h.you fought less fighters. grow sum balls for once.

[33030]

Floyd being force to define his career from one fight. Floyd doesnt need Pac. If anything Pac needs him. Even tho Pac is a Hall of Famer