Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Fury: If Money Was Right, I'd Face Deontay Wilder Next

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    This is what I wanted to hear, Fury on record saying he's targeting Wlad, after Wilder's comments I figured Wlad's two most credible opponents would face each other. Now it looks as though Wlad will face both, hopefully this year too.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Foreign Soil View Post
      Can it. Fury is borderline ducking Wilder here, which is pretty unbelievable with the level of talk he's known for.
      That's ridiculous. Makes more sense to say that Wilder is ducking Fury. Wilder is the WBC champ and Fury isn't mandatory with the WBC. If the fight is going to happen, the offer has to come from Wilder.

      He said he wants to fight Fury next, so why doesn't he make him an offer?

      All Fury is doing is letting Haymon know that he's available, but has other options. So if the offer does come, it had better be a good one, or no deal.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        You can receive a "career high payday" and it still be not satisfactory.

        If I offered 1 dollar over your highest purse to face Wladimir Klitschko, it would technically be a "career high payday" but it would be peanuts for the magnitude of the fight and the overall money available of which Wladimir takes more than the lion's share.

        Dereck Chisora received far more to fight David Haye and Tyson Fury than he did when challenging Vitali Klitschko for the world title.

        I don't remember you saying anything when Wladimir demanded more than the usual mandatory % split for the Pulev fight.
        Chisora was a relative unknown when he fought Vitali. His career highlight was losing a close fight with Robert Helenius.

        Obviously he'd earn more in an all-British PPV match-up, especially after the incident with Haye in Germany.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by yoz View Post
          Chisora was a relative unknown when he fought Vitali. His career highlight was losing a close fight with Robert Helenius.

          Obviously he'd earn more in an all-British PPV match-up, especially after the incident with Haye in Germany.

          Chisora made 300k to fight Vitali. A pretty meagre purse by any standards to fight for the World Heavyweight Title.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
            Ducking Wilder to fight Klitschko?

            And of course he'd be ducking Klitschko if he fought Wilder.

            Do you ever get tired of making a fool out of yourself?
            The fact that the biggest mouth in boxing is saying "if the money is right" says all you need to know. Fury isn't going to go get knocked out unless it's for good money, and if he has the balls to go through with the Wlad fight then it'll be for good money.

            Fury vs Wlad, get knocked out for more money.

            Fury vs Wilder, get knocked out for less money.

            Either way, his mouth has started to make less noise as of late... surely not a coincidence.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              Jennings is a good fighter, P4P maybe better than Fury. But P4P doesn't apply with heavyweights. Fury's sheer size makes him more dangerous than Jennings, especially to Wlad, imo.
              Jennings would last longer vs Wlad, though they both lose, Fury would hit the canvas harder and sooner.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Foreign Soil View Post
                The fact that the biggest mouth in boxing is saying "if the money is right" says all you need to know. Fury isn't going to go get knocked out unless it's for good money, and if he has the balls to go through with the Wlad fight then it'll be for good money.

                Fury vs Wlad, get knocked out for more money.

                Fury vs Wilder, get knocked out for less money.

                Either way, his mouth has started to make less noise as of late... surely not a coincidence.
                Why would he take less money to fight Wilder? Can you explain that ****** logic?

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  Why would he take less money to fight Wilder? Can you explain that ****** logic?
                  Because he'd have a better shot at winning, but even that's still too risky for him apparently. Wilder is looking more like the beast and Fury the lamb.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Foreign Soil View Post
                    Jennings would last longer vs Wlad, though they both lose, Fury would hit the canvas harder and sooner.
                    No doubt that Fury being 30/40 heavier would hit the canvas harder than Jennings if he did go down! But he would have a better chance than Bryant of making Wlad hit the deck.

                    Both are capable of going the distance with Wlad, I believe, with Fury more likely to end up winning. But yeah, Wlad would be favourite to beat both.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Foreign Soil View Post
                      Because he'd have a better shot at winning, but even that's still too risky for him apparently. Wilder is looking more like the beast and Fury the lamb.
                      So why isn't the beast trying to bring the lamb in for the slaughter?

                      Wilder said he wants to fight Fury next, so lets see if Haymon puts his money where Wilder's mouth is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP