Comments Thread For: Tyson Fury: Klitschko Shot First, Then Wilder Unification

[HEND]

That's logical and true. But truth and logic don't mean anything to "haters." As this post proves:

Nah, logical is not certainly equal with right. I see the logic why he doesn't want to fight Wilder before Klitschko even if Klitschko has a fight in April (because he is not so confident in himslef as he tries to show us and he doesn't know if he will beat Wilder or not, that's the opposite of what he talks all the time) but that doesn't mean I agree with it. He should stick to his words. This guys has a hell of a mouth but he isn't nearly as coonfident as he tries to show. That's the annoying about this guy. He claims himself a world beater all the time, yet just the blind don't see that he wants to cash out in the safest way. If he would be confident in himslef and he would be that good as he claims then he would beat Wilder during Klitschko deals with Jennings and after would beat Klitschko, but since he isn't confindet in himself just wants to cash out, he is a hypocrite. Whatever if it's Klitschko or Wilder but I hope one of them will KTFO this guy. The best scenario would be if Hammer would KTFO him but that won't happen.
Yo know I haven't got problem with big talkers, I have problem wih guys who have big mouth but they are all talk and nothing behind it.

[HEND]

Fury was offered 3 million to fight David Haye, so obviously he was going to turn down Pulev, a guy who at the time was unknown to everyone bar hardcore boxing fans. If the Haye fight wasn't offered, I'm sure he would've fought him no problem.

The reason he fought Chisora was Frank Warren offering him a stack of cash for it. Haye had just cancelled the fight for a second time, and Fury had to pay his bills. What's the issue here?

I understand it but it feels very hypocrite to hear all the time from Fury that "I'm the best in the world, etc..." while everyone can see that the guy just wants to cash out already and he knows exactly that he isn't that good. I wouldn't be surprised if he would retire just after Wlad beats him.

[Ryn0]

QUACK.... QUACK.... Damn Fury, come on man.

Can't tell if this is serious, Klitschko is the real champion with most of the belts and a harder fight for Fury. Wilder - Fury would bring in loads of money in the UK and be an 'easier' fight for Fury (I think he wins) but he wants to fight Klitschko since he is the mandatory and the real champion.

[Ryn0]

I understand it but it feels very hypocrite to hear all the time from Fury that "I'm the best in the world, etc..." while everyone can see that the guy just wants to cash out already and he knows exactly that he isn't that good. I wouldn't be surprised if he would retire just after Wlad beats him.

You don't understand the difference in boxing economics in the UK, for some reason in the USA losing a fight brings your marketability down from 100 to 0. There is a reason that even after losses Hatton, Khan, Froch, Audley, Harrison, Haye, Chisora, Burns get million pound/dollar paydays.

It works a bit differently in the UK, there is no 'cashing out' in the UK if you are a big name. Tyson Fury could lose to Klitschko and Wilder and still make a million fighting Price, Joshua or Haye. If Kell Brook fought tomorrow and lost to say Keith Thurman he would still make upwards of a million for a fight with Amir Khan.

Cleverly got stopped brutally by Kovalev, Bellew by Stevenson and still had big paydays against each other. Domestic fights bring in a lot more money than say a Bradley-Alexander and are almost always PPV. Groves was stopped twice by Froch, if Groves fought Degale he would also probably make a purse of over a million.

[Skip Bayless]

he is mandatory to wlad so why the balls would he fight wilder first? lets go champ

[kafkod]

Nah, logical is not certainly equal with right. I see the logic why he doesn't want to fight Wilder before Klitschko even if Klitschko has a fight in April (because he is not so confident in himslef as he tries to show us and he doesn't know if he will beat Wilder or not, that's the opposite of what he talks all the time) but that doesn't mean I agree with it. He should stick to his words. This guys has a hell of a mouth but he isn't nearly as coonfident as he tries to show. That's the annoying about this guy. He claims himself a world beater all the time, yet just the blind don't see that he wants to cash out in the safest way. If he would be confident in himslef and he would be that good as he claims then he would beat Wilder during Klitschko deals with Jennings and after would beat Klitschko, but since he isn't confindet in himself just wants to cash out, he is a hypocrite. Whatever if it's Klitschko or Wilder but I hope one of them will KTFO this guy. The best scenario would be if Hammer would KTFO him but that won't happen.
Yo know I haven't got problem with big talkers, I have problem wih guys who have big mouth but they are all talk and nothing behind it.

Fury is willing to fight both Wilder and Wlad, but he can't fight them both at the same time, so one has to come first.
But whatever he does, it won't please you. If he fights Wlad, he's ducking Wilder. Same thing if he did it the other way round. But give him credit for stepping up and fighting one of them? Nah ... he's just a hypocrite looking to cash out. Jeez.

[Lou Cipher]

Hahahahahaha Fury doesnt want it

[Elroy1]

Wilder will go back to fighting tomato cans anyway, you know Haymon & his team are going to milk that belt.

I bet he fights Tarver next.

That's true.

Wilder will be matched locally now. Bye bye WBC.

Fury's not ducking Wilder anyway wtf! Fighting Klitchko instead, the REAL HW champion hardly constitutes a duck Fury's earned the shot a lot more than bloody Wilder has!

[cuzzlo]

That's it Tyson, take out the smaller, stiffer fighter first, then Gavin Rees.