No I get what is being proposed. You have to back up and look at two things; first, the op I was responding to. I was very much on topic and on point.
Secondly, my original post where I said they buck both networks and go with a lesser network (Sky Sports, Fox Sports, ESPN, etc.) The fight sells itself. You don't need a big network to hold it up. I just don't know if their contracts mandate that they can NOT fight under another banner.
Secondly, my original post where I said they buck both networks and go with a lesser network (Sky Sports, Fox Sports, ESPN, etc.) The fight sells itself. You don't need a big network to hold it up. I just don't know if their contracts mandate that they can NOT fight under another banner.
Comment