The truth is Martinez is overrated. He's struggled against Euro-level Macklin and Murray. His best wins are Paul Williams and alcoholic Pavlik.
Why do people get upset when you question the validity of Cotto's win over Sergio?
Collapse
-
"peeleft:I must of missed that fight because I didn't see Mayweather destroy Cotto in the fight I watched. Yes Mayweather won a UD but it was one of Mayweather's toughest fights as witnessed by the damage and blood on Mayweather's face. You might want to go back and re-watch the fight without any audio so you're not distracted by the cheerleaders calling the fight.To be fair, Cotto was undefeated until he was destroyed by Floyd Mayweather.
When you consider that Cotto was undefeated until Floyd destroyed him, it levels the playing field in the Cotto vs Martinez fight. Both Serio and Miguel were not at 100%. In fact, I'd say that Cotto was at a greater disadvantage because he suffered that brutal beating from Floyd and still suffered the effects of enduring his first loss. Those thoughts must have still been fresh in his mind vs FloydComment
-
Comment
-
but a crippled martinez will be sitting there waiting for cottos left or right , lol, a bum like trout paraded around the ring agaist cottos meddlewight division left right and anything cotto delivered, martinez was a sitting dukk, trout was a bum but he fought like a master vs cotto, trout is no master, martinez was a brace wearing fool in the fight he fought cotto, he had a brace on cuz he had a injury which troubled martinezthe entire fight, remember, martinez was injured and wore a brace, a fact
Comment
-
Whatever you want to think of the condition of Martinez.. The fact remains that Cotto beat the stuffing out of him.
To question the validity is an exercise in futility. What is valid is exactly what happened.. That is; two men competed in a sanctioned boxing match and one clearly prevailed. That is validity by definition.
Anything else is just speculation.Comment
-
martinez was wearing knee braces during the fight, you cant lie about that or rephrase that to change your propagandaWhatever you want to think of the condition of Martinez.. The fact remains that Cotto beat the stuffing out of him.
To question the validity is an exercise in futility. What is valid is exactly what happened.. That is; two men competed in a sanctioned boxing match and one clearly prevailed. That is validity by definition.
Anything else is just speculation.
besides you saw what trout did to cotto 2 fights ago, lol, you cant change that eitherLast edited by Tha_Greatest; 12-27-2014, 06:44 PM.Comment
-
you seriously thought that martinez(being injured) would beat cotto, lol, any logic wouldve gone against your beliefs, lol, i wouldve assumed that fight was finished before martinez hobbled in, lol, ask trout, when trouts average azz foght cotto, he put on a clinic, lol, i cant believe you thought martinez was gonna win, lol, as you stated, after the fight, you realized how bad sergios knees were gone, lol, you cool for recognizing the truth
Comment
Comment